[QUOTE=VCO3]
It was closer to your “cerebral” choice, though without the self-righteousness and all of that. It was this - “This is a college town in the middle of nowhere in a rural area, where there are very few jobs to go around. Literally everyone you employ is a student, yet you have the audacity to enforce an unreasonable policy such as this because you know you can get away with it because there are no other jobs open anywhere else. Because everyone you employ is a student, and because this is in the middle of nowhere, you’re keeping them from ever (as long as they want to have a job) being able to go home to see their families. You are a fat asshole, you smug piece of garbage.”
I can’t stand this predatory, exploitative attitude in any person, but especially a smug fuck that knows he can get away with it. We need more people to extend the bounds of social censure to direct, uncomfortable confrontation - like if I had pushed the guy or gotten in his face and told him what an asshole he (knew he) was being - rather than just quite, politely complicit avoidance.
[/QUOTE]
Again justifying physically attacking another person because they believe/represent/??? something that differs from your life view. 'Cuz we all know that a restaurant managers is THE MAN, and THE MAN should not get away with this! :rolleyes:
As even sven has shown us, not all employees are reliable. After all this ridicule I’ve poured on ya, could you possibly take a second to think about WHY that policy was there? Or do you really believe that it was a random power-trip that this guy pulled to make himself feel better (assuming that he is the one, in fact, that created the policy and is not just implementing it because the owner told him to)? I worked in restaurants while in college - I know what goes on. Students are FLAKES. This policy might just keep the flakier ones away. Secondly, you ever schedule the running of a restaurant? I have. It sucks. You get a little basket of torn pieces of paper with all the dates that people are requesting off, and you have to somehow juggle all of this and make sure that everyone still works enough hours to support themselves. You have to balance those that want time off with those that want to work. Sure, you could have that one employee that was willing to work 3 hours one week and 60 hours the next, but they are rare. Most people want a normal schedule so they can plan their lives around it. So let’s say a normal week (not Christmas!) requires 30 people - 10 cooks, 10 bus-boys, 10 wait-staff to fill in all shifts (no, it is never that exact). Let’s say most people want to work 5 days a week for 8 hours (your standard 40 hour week). Now let’s say just one individual wants to take a 4 day weekend to visit mom. Those additional 2 days of vacation represents 2 extra 8 hour shifts that need to be filled by someone doing the same job. So 9 people now have to juggle their lives to fill an extra 2 shifts (because the other 2 would be a normal period of no work and thus considered beforhand). Not that bad - I’m sure someone wants the extra time and will work 7 days/shifts that week. Plus, hey, maybe we can hire a part-time person. But the moment that 2 people want similar 4 day periods off you really start running into scheduling problems - you now have to fill a total of 8 shifts of work between the remaining 8 people, 4 of which you weren’t really planning on. And because you are ALL students, as you say, I’m betting that outside of the restaurant your lives are all pretty similar, so the chances that people ask for the same days off are high. And I’ve only gone into one section of the restaurant needing to juggle the schedule around your long weekend. What if the cooks were down 2 (long weekend and sickness) and the busboys were down 3? Now the manager is facing the real possibility of not having anyone available for a shift on Friday night! So what are the choices? Have a bunch of people on the books that will only work during the vacation days of others (yeah, right)? OR MAYBE YOU IMPLEMENT A POLICY THAT TREATS EVERYONE EQUALLY, FAIRLY AND HONESTLY THAT SOLVES THE PROBLEM? What do you think Mr. Smug manager will do when a great cook that is always on time and doesn’t screw the orders up asks for 5 days off? You think Mr. Smug is going to just let this person go and face the risk of hiring someone new that might not be that great? Or will they say “Hey, you’re great! I understand you need to visit mom this week. But I still have to follow policy…however, I’m sure if you re-apply wink wink you have a good chance of getting hired again. See you next Thursday!” That policy exists to get rid of the poor performers, the complainers, the ones that will show up late and try to leave early, take multipe days off while complaining they don’t get enough shifts to pay rent, and lastly the ones that physically threaten others when they disagree instead of politely avoiding them. Otherwise put, that policy exists to easily get rid of people like you and even sven.
You are an idiot and a bully if you justify physically attacking others that disagree with you as a rational response.
-Tcat
