Googling your username

Okay, I do have work to do, what’s your point?

Came across this while googling my username.

I’ve got $5 that says no one can top it.

Well, how about this

Pretty doggone good – but not better. :smiley:

Another reason I need to seriously consider changing my username. I don’t get any odd or cool sites with a search

just this

I kind of like this one.

I got what I expected: a bunch of links to Elvis Costello and/or retail sites.

5 whole hits, and not for anything cool, either.

Just stuff like this and this. I didn’t expect any hits at all, but I guess I should have counted on the typos.

I get 216,000,000 hits. I’m sure there’s something cool in one of them. Finding it is going to take a while.

I come up with a lot of Fairy sites, but I’m amused by the tag line for this one

Look! Generic Wedding People! I don’t know them, but they sure look pretty. I love weddings. <<sniff>>

The second and third hits were for a review of the 2000 movie, “Romeo Must Die”.

The review was titled, “Kung Fu Shakespeare”.

But the really weird thing: the review was in the student newspaper of my college alma mater!

(Twilight Zone music…)

Absolutely nothing that isn’t correctly attributed to me.

All I get are things I posted elsewhere. I completely forgot about this! My reply is about half-way down.

I get zero hits.

That means I am an original!!!

Didn’t expect anything, but I shouldn’t have been surprised to find others adopting this username (none of the other BJMoose is me). Nothing worth sharing.

(at last: a truly pointless post!)

Not a single result that isn’t related to me. That’s boring.

Plenty of hits, but #1 is interesting: Tolerance, toxicity, and caloric availability of intravenously injected tapioca dextrin solution in rabbits.
:eek: :eek: :eek:

One link to someones web site with a pretty good quote by me regarding Star Wars Episode I.

Lurking near the bottom of the first results page was some info about a guy by the name of Xenophanes of Colophon. Now that’s a name.

Well, who among us hasn’t?

Meanwhile, in Google Images, this was kind of odd, this was less odd but cuter, and this was quite cool, in an abstract sort of way.

I got zero hits too. <sob>