All very, very horrible.
But far, far better than Tea Party false-astroturf-libertarianism, at any rate. And, it’s not as if the Tea Party actually has a problem with any of that, or even takes any real notice of it.
Bailouts, deficits, and housing bubble inflated by government wouldn’t happen under the tea party. That’s enough for me to choose the tea partiers over the RINOs. Rove’s gang are nothing but political opportunists peddling influence. I’ll take Reagan over Nixon any day.
Quite true. Of course we’d be a third world country, but that couldn’t possibly problematic could it?
Hell, I’d take Reagan over Nixon any day, in much the same way as I’d take dysentery over smallpox.
I can remember sitting down one night and catching a bit of cable news in the 1990s. Not Fox. And they were on about Hillary Clinton having somebody murdered. At the time it was genuinely difficult to keep up with the endless “scandals” the liberal media were pushing about the Clintons but I felt on safe ground with this one and knew a bit about the Vince Foster case. But it turned out they were speculating about her ordering the murder of somebody else entirely. Add on the drug running stuff, the unbelievably stupid stuff like the White House Christmas tree and the sheer volume of stuff on the TV and even in papers like the NYT and WaPost throughoput the 90s and what more can they say?
Whoever is Democratic nominee is oing to be smeared as a Communist America hater anyway. Hillary is bulletproof on this stuff, the only people the smears will appeal to hate her anyway and it’ll make moderates and undecideds, the people who decide elections, vote for her. If she stays healthy she’s guaranteed to run and guaranteed to win.
Here’s the latest:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/02/the_empire_strikes_back_part_ii.php
Money never had power. All the rest of us had to do is show up to vote. And we did.
The LIBERAL media?
No, you’re wrong. It does not depend on the definition of “their,” because what you mean to say is something like “it depends on their antecedent to the somewhat ambiguous ‘their’ in that sentence, which could squint towards both ‘Tea Party’ and ‘Republican voters.’” Since you have used the incorrect terminology, every point you ever have made or ever will make is hereby invalidated.
Just thought you’d enjoy being treated to a typical “John Mace”-style niggling correction. Have you ever considered changing your username to “invalidator”? It would go well with “elucidator.” Kind of a nice matched set.
P.S. You can be grateful I didn’t light on your punctuation issues to invalidate your every word, thought, and deed.
Or like listening to the Occupy movement.
I don’t think it’s as much of a lock as everyone thinks it is. It would be a long, torturous path, with no guarantees at the end. People love her now, she’s old. She won’t run.
Occupy was co-opted by day 2. Which was unsurprising.
Just this morning I read a list of misused words, and “torturous” was on it. The correct word is “tortuous.” I wouldn’t have posted this if it weren’t for reading about it just an hour ago. It was fate.
I’m being ironic. Nobody who saw what happened to the Clintons in the 1990s could ever think that the media is liberal.
Also, too. Hillary doesn’t care about being loved. She cares about getting in the White House and jamming a big red, white and blue dildo up the arses of all the conservative/GOP pols/media/donors who made her life a misery in the 1990s. She’d have an eight year schadenfreudegasm.
Okay.
Whew.
Yes a balanced budget, sound money, and free market capitalism are the telltale symptoms of a third world country.
Steve King is possibly the craziest non-Gohmert in Congress. What have the TP got against him? Farm subsidies?
Can you explain how the Tea Party will achieve that? So far they’ve suggested no way to balance the budget and make money sound except to stop paying our bills. As for free market capitalism, the US has always led the world in providing this, and the Tea Party has done nothing but complain about the regulations required to maintain that. If you consider Zimbabwe to have acheived the ideals you speak of, then we should definitely follow the incoherent political philosphy of the Tea Party.
Here’s my guess, Tripolar. Gonna put it in a spoiler box to see if I’m correct with the reply:
Balanced budget amendments, restoring the gold standard, and deregulation.