GOP Presidential Debate

One moment I forgot to mention was when McCain was doing his tough-guy pose, leaning forward with shoulder hunched, promising that he’d follow Bin Laden to the Gates of Hell. All the while, completely incongruously, smiling. That was a little unsettling. McCain has the bad habit of smiling at the end of a sentence when he’s talking to the media, no matter the content of the sentence. I’ve seen him do this a couple of times now.

I thought Romney seemed likeable, polished, and just on the basis of charisma and likeability (which seem to be uncomfortably large factors in these contests), a real threat to Hillary if she’s the dem nominee (but less so Barack or John).

[QUOTE=Squink]
MR. MATTHEWS: Let me go to, Senator – do you think Scooter Libby should be –
SEN. BROWNBACK: Let the legal process move forward, and I’d leave that up to President Bush. And I think he could go either way on that.
[/QUOTE]

Don’t want to comment on an ongoing investigation. Oops. Need to update that old talking point. Get Snowjob on the line, stat!

-Joe

FYI: Brownback, Huckabee and Tancredo were the three who raised their hand for not beliving in evolution.

Actually only three out of ten is better then I would’ve thought.

Hey, I just figured out who raised their hands. It was Tancredo, Brownback, and Huckabee. I’m glad we finally cleared that up.

[QUOTE=Mr. Moto]
I happen to think the Republicans have quite a strong field of candidates. I do agree with Ramesh Ponnuru that a lot of people are uncomfortable with it because it is somewhat of an unorthodox bunch.
[/QUOTE]

What would an orthodox bunch look like?!

[QUOTE=Richard Parker]
Hey, I just figured out who raised their hands. It was Tancredo, Brownback, and Huckabee. I’m glad we finally cleared that up.
[/QUOTE]

It’s not official till I’ve awknowledged it.

(missed your post, sorry)

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
What would an orthodox bunch look like?!
[/QUOTE]

Black outfits and long beards.

[QUOTE=Malodorous]
FYI: Brownback, Huckabee and Tancredo were the three who raised their hand for not beliving in evolution.

Actually only three out of ten is better then I would’ve thought.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah. It’s better than what you’d find in the general population, too.

Sadly, this is going to be a common question for awhile. Non-Americans must really be puzzled that we have to ask that of our **presidential **candidates.

Anybody know the deal with the type of stem cells Romney was talking about?

[QUOTE=Malodorous]
It’s not official till I’ve awknowledged it.

(missed your post, sorry)
[/QUOTE]

And Biffy! :smiley:

[QUOTE=gladtobeblazed]
. . . (notice I spelled them demoNcrats) . . .
[/QUOTE]

:rolleyes: Yeah, I see that lameass crap on Free Republic all the time. Variations include DemocRATS, dimicrats, dhimmicrats (from “dhimmi,” the Arabic term for a tolerated infidel living under Islamic rule) , demonrats, or just plain “the RATS.”

Don’t expect Comedy Central to return your calls.

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
What would an orthodox bunch look like?!
[/QUOTE]
They’d all wear the same tie.

[QUOTE=gatorman]
Wow, NOT A SINGLE one of them have what I’m looking for in the next president, no wonders independents like me are going democratic.
[/QUOTE]
You’re not alone:

[QUOTE=gladtobeblazed]
Much beter than the Demoncrats debate. I can’t bear to watch Hillary for more than 2 minutes at a time. And that black guy, what’s his name? Osama? I only first heard about him about 7 months ago. I’ll take a Republican over a Demoncrat any damn day of the week.

VOTE REPUBLICAN!
[/QUOTE]

You’ll not find much patience for that kind of mindless drivel on this board. If you intend to stick around for awhile it would behoove you to engage in actual debate before you develop a reputation that will be hard to undo. Good luck!

[QUOTE=John Mace]
You’ll not find much patience for that kind of mindless drivel on this board. If you intend to stick around for awhile it would behoove you to engage in actual debate before you develop a reputation that will be hard to undo. Good luck!
[/QUOTE]

You really think that’s his big concern, John?

-Joe

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
:rolleyes: Yeah, I see that lameass crap on Free Republic all the time. Variations include DemocRATS, dimicrats, dhimmicrats (from “dhimmi,” the Arabic term for a tolerated infidel living under Islamic rule) , demonrats, or just plain “the RATS.”
[/QUOTE]
Truly, it pales in comparison to the Algonquin-like Shrub, Repugnicans and Faux News, no?

[QUOTE=Kneepants Erasmus, the Humanist]
I also am curious about who said they didn’t believe in evolution…I saw a few hands up, but I couldn’t see who. (I am sure Brownback was one. What a smarmy bastard. Ugh)
[/QUOTE]
According to Andrew Sullivan’s website, the 3 were Brownback, Huckabee, and Tancredo.

[QUOTE=Merijeek]
You really think that’s his big concern, John?

-Joe
[/QUOTE]

Yeah, it’s not very likely, but you never know.

He does have one shining light of humor, a veritable 24-karat gold nugget of gleaming solidified laffs. “Obama sounds like Osama!” You know, I don’t think anyone has ever pointed that out! That’s funny! It’s funny because it’s true! Anyone with a first name that sounds like a terrorist has to hate America! Why does he hate America? Why won’t he flip over the tortoise?

Are these the independents that the Democrats are supposed to triangulate towards? Maybe Obama should change his name. I’m sure that will get bunches of the “indies” to vote Dem.

What’s the take on Ron Paul? Is the the Republican version of Kucinich, or is he a true free-thinking Republican? I am intrigued by his votes against the war on Iraq and the Patriot Act.