I like the can. I like the bottle even more (gotta drink from the bottle though).
From the tap is best but only if it is fresh. Go to a bar with dirty lines or a bar that doesn’t serve it often and it tastes really bad.
Guinness in a can is much better than Guinness in a bottle. Neither is as good as from the tap though.
Is this some sort of marketing-bot or are you a real person?
After hearing for years that Guinness Extra-Stout is supossed to be the god of drinks, I bought a six pack last week. It was the most disgusting drink I’ve ever tasted (on the same level as Moxie) … what the hell is supossed to be so great about it???
Er… I lack the proper adjectives to formulate a reply to your question there** Fusoya** maybe its because its such a MANLY drink 
…are you a MarketingBot for Stoli? or are you a real person?:dubious:
Touche.
I was just curious as to the sorta non-sequitur nature of your post, I figured it was a bot or a bit.
No offense chum, welcome!
no, no, no.miller is beer, guinness is stout, there is a difference.
No, I don’t think so. Stout is a subclass of beer. Actually, a subclass of ale, which is a subclass of beer.
Vastly different styles, but still beer. Mmmm…beer.
Here is the way that I see it. IMHO:
Guinness Extra Stout in bottles - The nectar of the gods. If my wallet and digestive system could handle it, it would be my only beverage of choice.
Guinness in Cans - Not too shabby as long as you pour it out of the can first.
Guinness Draught in bottles - I would rather drink Pabst. If you pour it in a glass, it tastes god-awful. Marginally better if you leave it in the bottle but still not worth the trip.
The widget actually releases Nitrogen (morte precisely, a mixturte of Nitrogen and a bit of beer that sneaks into the widget).
i did not know that(in the voice of johnny carson)…thanks for the clarification…