Guys: Are tattooed women easier than the non-tatted?

Guys, in your personal experience, do you get laid more often when dating tattooed women or untattooed women?

This is a poll to satisfiy my curiosity, not a judgment about tattoos or those who wear them.

Well you are already assured they can stand a moderate amount of pain, so tolerating your presence is a possibility.

Tatted women are used to little pricks.

Tattooed woman, thanking the previous respondants.

And here I always thought it was my need to feel loved because I’m ugly that I am easy.
Go figure it has been the tatts all the time.
I have piercings as well, and you all know what that means!!! :eek:

Wait a sec…
I think I should ask my husband that. Seems he used to get laid alot more when we first got married and I was un-tattooed.
So it’s been a lie all this time. It’s not the ring or the wedding cake that makes women frigid!
So those thinking about getting married heed this warning! Do not get your spouse a tattoo!

But you did ask about dating so maybe this post is just crap.
He got laid alot when we were dating and I was untattooed. I think the ink did something to my sex drive.

Let’s see…have had sexual experiences with six woman, let’s look at the stats:

Sex: 4 of those 6
Fooled around: 2 of those 6
Number of women tatooed: 3 of those 6 (well…4, but that one got a tatoo after we broke up, so I don’t count it.)

Now as to the prospect of which ones were “easier” is tricky, since I knew all of them save 1 for a while before having sex with them (we’ll call her A.) A, for the record, is tatoo-less, and we fooled around the second night we knew each other. Let’s break down the rest, calling them B-F.

B: First girlfriend, no tatoo, no sex, and was months before stuff happened (we were both virgins, she is also the one that later got a tattoo. And, FTR, she is also one who will never have sex eary in a relationship. No third date rule here.)

C: Second girlfriend, no tatoo. I met her in November, and had our first date in February, and that night nkaed things happened. No sex, cause I was still a virgin, but everything up to actual sex happened, and would have happened if not for my current state.

D: Third girlfriend, has a tatoo. I met her in May, started dating her in September. Was a week before fooling around happened, and one moer week till sex happened, and according to her, that was earlier than she usually “gives it up.”

E: Umm…first “friend with benefits.” We met in the September I started dating D, before I was dating D. I originally pursued E, because D told me a few months ago after we met she didn’t want to date me (obviously she changed that attitude.) But E was more interested in a friend of mine, so I gave up. A couple months after they broke up (and about five months after I broke up with D) we had some sex. It was, however, the first night I actually was trying to get her in bed.

F: Second “friend with benefits.”, tatooed. We met at a friend’s graduation party (irronically enough, the same friend as in E.) She was a friend of his from home (and, oddly enough, F is also the younger sister of A…yeah.) A month or so after the party I started talking with F online and we got pretty chummy. Eventually, she came up to visit me because she was visiting friends at the college she used to go to and it was near me. She arrived Friday evening and by that night boots were a-knockin’.
So you decide for yourself whether the tattooed girls are easier or not.

Hmmm. I’m a “tattoed girl,” and was wondering if this was some sort of limited-time-only offer. :stuck_out_tongue:

Anyway, to actually answer the OP… I’m 36 and have a butterfly on my lower back and a small shamrock on my right ankle. I’ve only been with 3 men in my life and was still a virgin (albeit sans ink) until I was 24.

Don’t know exactly where that puts me, but I don’t quite believe it makes me “easy.” However, considering that I’m about to be divorced and I ain’t gettin’ no younger, I could be up to the possibility of changing that status. Perhaps it would be more fun. :smiley:

Oooooooo!
Faithfool has a tatt on her lower back!
We all know what that means, don’t we?

*wink wink, nudge nudge

for the record I have one there also! :wink:

The percentage of women in porn with tattoos covering their lower backs is uncanny.

Well, I don’t know if I should be flattered or scared (porn, oh my!)… because Kricket, I don’t know what that means. Eep! See what happens when you’ve been off the market for soooo long?? :eek: So, can you help me out or do I need you to email me for the definition?

Regardless, if it makes us cool, who could resist? Especially since I’ve never been that in my life. Or in the “in crowd” or anything else.

Just a nerd. Who might like being wild. What all does it entail? :wink:

(hehehehe – I used a word that has ‘tail’ in it)

Depends on the environment/woman/tattoo I would say.
In college, tatted and/or pierced girls would put out quicker.
But that was before tatts became the rage and every moron had a “cutesy” tiny ass butterfly somewheres. Then piercing became the rage and every moron had the belly button ring with some lame flower or something.

But the super tatted pierced girls seemed to be the kind of super freaks that dearly missed Rick “I’m Rick James Beeotch!” James sang about.

Now-a-days it seems to be a pretty mixed bag depending on the woman. It still seems like smokers put out more. Also, since tatts and piercings have become more common, it depends on the woman more than just having or not having.

But back in the day (1990-1998 for me), it certainly seemed like it.

Based on my personal experience, my answer would be “No, not necessarily easier to get into bed than non-tattooed women.”

My personal taste in women runs more towards women who would consider tattoos, as opposed to women who would never consider such a thing, so I’m inclined to consider that experience valid.

I have noticed, however, that women with tattoos are generally much more willing to tear their clothes off and show you their cartoons at the drop of a hat, so they might SEEM easier. Certainly less modest, at any rate.

I hasten to point out, though, that the vast majority of women who have torn off their clothes to show me their lower backs, center backs, buttocks, nipples, navels, and various other things…

…have NOT gone on to sleep with me. They were just showin’ me their pretties, so to speak.

Not that I’m complainin’. :cool:

I’m thinking that the OP has misconstrued the term “tit-for-tat”.

I have one tattoo on my right arm. I’m not easy, I’m just friendly.:smiley:

Based on the girls I know, tattooed girls (at least the ones who have more than the typical butterflies and such) may be more sexually experimental, though not necessarily quicker to jump into bed with one. Note that I am a woman and my evidence is completely anecdotal.

Two of the three women I have been with have had tattoos. The other one was too young at the time to get one legally, though she now has three.

Hey!! What’s all the grief about butterflies?? I have a specific reason for having gotten mine (which, if anyone’s interested, has to do with mental health issues – so there!) and I’m too old to be trendy anyhow.

What was the question again? :wink:

And dammit, someone tell me what the locations mean. Or, at least the specific one mentioned above. I gotta know if this makes me more of a hoochie than I realized. I may have a reputation to start. ’

P.S. Since I just got my tongue pierced again tonight, does that mean I’m at least on the right path? :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

Aw, the butterflies are cute. I like them. No offense intended, faithfool.

According to urbandictionary.com a lower back tattoo on a woman means she likes to have sex from behind.

Hmm…do all the girls on my campus with lower back tattoos know that? There seems to be a high proportion of them.

Full link to the entry.

I’ve also heard that a lower back tatoo means a girl likes anal sex. This is about as true as Mikey from the Life cereal commercial dying from pop rocks and soda.

Now, do girls who get them there like to have sex in general from behind more than usual? Maybe…I wouldn’t say they neccesarilly say to themselves “hmm…I like doggie style…might as well get a lower back tatoo to tell that to the world!” But it does makes sense that AFTER they get the tatoo, which, in many people’s opinion, can be sexy, they would want to show it off to their lover. What better way than during sex? Therefore sex would have to be from behind.

Sorry I didn’t get back her sooner, but it looks like other have the explaination covered.
I would sure like to know the meaning of your butterfly though. That is my next tatt, and not just because it is trendy.
I have my tongue and nipples pierced and two tatts.
But hey, most of the people around here already know I’m on the wild side. :smiley:

Kricket sure sounds…interesting. :smiley:

I would like to get my tongue pierced but it’s merely a fantasy. Not sure how it would work out in everyday life.