Harry Potter Book Five Teaser/Spoiler!

If you go to the Amazon.com website, you’ll find a link on the front page to an audio excerpt from Jim Dale’s reading of Order of the Phoenix. Not the teasers we already have of the opening lines, etc., but a whole new few paragraphs.

Sounds as though it’s from the beginning of the book, so no major plot points spoiled. You just get enough to really whet your appetite.

I haven’t revealed any spoilers in my OP, but I’m hoping to have an open discussion about the excerpt in the thread. So if you don’t want to know anything about the book ahead of time, PLEASE DON’T READ ANY FURTHER!!

I can’t get the exceprt to play. :frowning: I don’t suppose you could transcribe it, could you? (I understand if you don’t want to).

Reading the review, I came across this:

How bizarre. I used to have dreams like that. I would be moving along the corridor towards the door, just about to open it, but I never would actually open it. On the other side of the door was death. There was nothing more to the dream than that, and the day after that dream I would always have a lingering sense of dread.

Nothing to do with HP of course - it’s just very strange to find a description of my own dream in a book review!

Harry in trouble for Underage magic again… what a shock ;). But what could have been a life threatening situation? I wonder… though I did catch something about Dementors in there.

Curious :D.

And I wonder what house they were in? It wasn’t the Weasley’s house… they don’t have doors with doorknobs shaped like a serpent, but there was Mrs. Weasley hurrying Harry into a room where Ron and Hermione were waiting… and in the early part of the book as well.

No problem, SciFiSam. I copied & pasted this from a post on Yahoo’s Harry Potter for Grownups Site. (Hope this is okay, mods…)


Harry’s bewilderment deepened with every step he took. What on Earth
were they doing in a house that looked as though it belonged to the
darkest of wizards?

“Mrs Weasley, why–”

“Ron and Hermione will explain everything, dear. I’ve really got to
dash,” Mrs Weasley whispered distractedly. “There.” They had reached
the second landing. “You’re the door on the right. I’ll call you when
it’s over!” And she hurried off downstairs again.

Harry crossed the dingy landing, turned the bedroom doorknob, which
was shaped like a serpent’s head, and opened the door. He caught a
brief glimpse of a gloomy, high-ceilinged, twin-bedded room; then
there was a loud, twittering noise, followed by an even louder
shriek, and his vision was completely obscured by a large quantity of
very bushy hair.

Hermione had thrown herself onto him in a hug that nearly knocked him
flat, while Ron’s tiny owl, Pigwidgeon, zoomed excitedly round and
round their heads.

“Harry! Ron, he’s here! Harry’s here! We didn’t hear you arrive. Oh,
how are you? Are you all right? Have you been furious with us? I’ll
bet you have. I know our letters were useless, but we couldn’t tell
you anything! Dumbledore made us swear we wouldn’t! Oh, we’ve got so
much to tell you! And you’ve got to tell us! The Dementors…when we
heard…and that Ministry hearing…it’s just outrageous! I’ve looked
it all up. They can’t expel you! They just can’t! There’s provision
in the Decree for the Restriction of Underage Sorcery for the use of
magic in life-threatening situations–”

“Let him breathe, Hermione,” said Ron, grinning, closing the door
behind Harry. He seemed to have grown several more inches during
their month apart, making him taller and more gangly-looking than
ever, though the long nose, bright red hair and freckles were the
same.

The HP4GU list, as well as The Leaky Cauldron, pulled the transcript after Amazon & AOL (who also had it up for their members) got into a bit of legal trouble over releasing that audio clip. They had to pull it.

Apparently, it’s back up on AOL with approval (though I haven’t checked for sure), but people might want to step lightly around this one for a bit.

Well, Amazon still has it up on the main page so I’m going to assume it’s okay. I’ve notified the mods, though, to check this out and make sure we’re in the clear.

My questions:

Molly says she’ll come get Harry “when it’s over.” When WHAT’s over?

And was there a dementor attack at Privet Drive?

I don’t think I’m going to make it another week…can’t wait to unravel all of this.

Our little Ron is becoming a man.

Oh no, only just saw this thread again! Thankyou for copying that over, Oreo. It sounds really good, and raises lots of questions for me.

I’m glad that it indicates that Harry does spend part of the summer with the Weasleys. He’s obviously not in their house now though - no idea where he is. In fact, I have no idea what’s going on at all! I like the way it’s written though - gives me very high hopes for the book.

JK Rowling has revealed that one of the principals is killed off. Maybe this is the passage leading up to that?

Jeff, one of the “principals” or one of the “principles”?

And I don’t buy the theories about Ron/Hermione/Dumbledore/Hagrid buying the farm. She said that last time, and it ended up being a character she introduced in that book (for the most part).

I admit, I had to look in Microsoft Bookshelf for the right word. It’s the first one - “A person having a leading or starring role.” The story is that she was crying over this one, I don’t think she’d cry unless it was someone who has been around since the beginning.

cite 1 cite 2

What I mean about the “principal” vs. “principle” is that “principal” is a schoolmaster, i.e. the principal of a school. We’ve met three in the Harry Potter books. “Principle” would be a main character.

Not according to the Merriam-Webster, Munch.

Nah, the correct usage would be ‘principal character.’ Plus, JK would never refer to Dumbledore as the Principal - that’s an Americanism. Dumbledore’s the Headmaster.

Harry has a love interest of sorts but is confused because he doesn’t understand girls.

Yes, but as an adjective. Alone, “principal” takes on an entirely different meaning. When I put it in www.m-w.com it came up with the adj. form, which is what Jeff is referring to. The noun is very much different, and would refer to a headmaster. It just threw me off, making me think that Rowling was a little more specific in who died.

No big deal.

From Munch’s link (bolding mine):

Only on the SDMB could a Harry Potter discussion turn into a discussion of linguistics. :slight_smile:

Jeff, using the 6th definition to support your usage when the first 5 support mine is a little underhanded, don’t you think? :wink:

However, I will admit that I never knew that “principle” is never an adjective, and would have fought to the death that it’s “the coach’s principle concern” instead of the other way around. Good show.