Thanks for starting this Thread, Sam Lowry! I wouldn’t have known about this movie otherwise.
First thing’s first: The detail about the ending that you put into your spoiler box in the OP is not correct. Not even in an up for interpretation kind of a way. It’s just wrong. JKilez, you put a winky smilie next to your suggestion of the twist so I figure you didn’t mean it seriously but just to cover all bases: no, that’s also incorrect.
Since this Thread is for people who haven’t seen it, I’ll just give general impressions.
It’s definitely not an Adam Sandler movie. It’s a movie that happens to have Adam Sandler as the lead actor. One thing I can give the guy credit for- when he’s hired on to someone else’s project (Punch Drunk Love, Spanglish, Men Women and Children), he respects the director’s vision and accepts the director’s guidance. There’s no attempt to cram his own comic schtick into the project. The same can be said for this movie.
I mentioned that, of the very few theaters near me that are showing this movie, two of the theaters are art house theaters. This movie isn’t very extreme in art house film territory. It can be easily digested by anyone who mostly only watches mainstream Hollywood movies.
I’ve never seen The Visitor but I have seen The Station Agent and I liked it. This movie is faster paced and not as contemplative. Still, it is not nearly as fast paced as a typical mainstream Hollywood comedy. Some of the comedy is “wacky” but it comes in characters responses to the magical elements of the story so the wackiness is connected to the characters and the plot. It’s not over-the-top wackiness, cheap gags, and nonsequiturs. Noteworthy: none of the comedy that could be considered “wacky” comes from Sandler himself. Method Man actually delivers some of the best comedic performances.
I definitely enjoyed it very much and would certainly recommend it. I don’t want to oversell it though. It’s a good movie. It’s not going to blow you away, I can’t imagine many people putting it on their list of favorites, but it is good and it is enjoyable from start to finish without any lulls.
Why is it getting no love in the marketing department? I don’t know. It’s possible the studio didn’t get the movie they thought they were going to get and thought “What the hell do we do with whatever this is?” It’s not arty enough to market to the art house scene and it’s not mainstream enough to market to mainstream audiences.
There’s also the Punch Drunk Love problem, people going to see what they think is going to be an “Adam Sandler Movie” then getting confused and angry at getting something that didn’t meet their expectations. At least previews for Punch Drunk Love and Spanglish presented those films in a way that they didn’t look like Adam Sandler movies. Conversely, the whole concept for The Cobbler does seem like it could be a wacky Adam Sandler movie. In fact, I just now watched the trailer (I hadn’t watched it before seeing the movie) and the trailer does make it seem like a wacky Adam Sandler broad comedy.
Maybe they’re thinking if they tried to market for a huge opening weekend, audiences would react badly at the movie not being what they had expected, they’d hate the movie for not fitting into the mold they thought it was meant for, and it would be an fast accepted fact that this movie sucks. Maybe they’re thinking instead to start small and get good word of mouth so that an audience would grow slowly as people watch based on friends’ recommendations having had their expectations properly adjusted. Is that giving marketing executives way too much credit for playing the long game?