Hastur, I tried to be the voice of reason, but you are being a schmuck

In this thread, and in this thread, you have created a new and unique definition of homophobe:

homophobe n. Someone who disagrees with Hastur.

The Hastur Dictionary

december is your chief target - though now that I’ve posted this, I’m sure I’m next to be labelled. But damn, you must be right - it’s your dictionary after all.

Let’s look at december’s obviously homophobic statements.

Oooh, evil and nasty.
Maybe it’s this one:

God, that bastard december has had the gall to point out that activities by gay activists may cause a reaction, but that’s no reason for the gay activists to stop engaging in those activities, and that homophobia in schools should be stopped.
What is he, from the 5th Century?

I tried to calm the waters in the first thread I linked above, Hastur, but you continued. Stop doing damage to your cause by opening your yap. I share your cause, and I don’t want it hurt by the likes of you.

Sua

At the risk of jumping in to something which my <20 posts haven’t prepared me for, I second Sua’s opinion.

Durned imposter! Have you been the one running up bills on my credit cards too? :smiley:

Count me with december in saying that the two million gay teens in fear of harrassment figure seems a bit high. The link provided went into far less detail about methodology than december’s cite, and seems to come from an equally biased source. It seems unlikely to me that there are more than about 20 million teens in this country, and even if 10% of them are gay, that means that every one of them is afraid of being harrassed, even those who no one knows are gay, or haven’t even realized it themselves yet.

Judging from what I’ve seen of december’s posts, he has never appeared homophbic to me, in the slightest, and I have looked (as someone on the conservative side of most debates, I look for signs of idiocy among those on my side, thus I know to distance myself from what puddleglum says, but that december isn’t likely to embarrass me). Hastur, on the other hand is someone I’ve generally known to be quick to insult those who disagree with him, and to apply the homophobic label to anyone who does not support his agenda. In short, he’s an ashole.

Wow. Now the fact that I want and deserve equal rights, as all people do, is an agenda. How nice.

december has claimed that gay kids get preferential treatment in schools, and that while Straight Pride shirts get a kid into trouble, Gay Pride shirts are encouraged.
He said this in:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=71740

He admitted later he could not find a cite for this, and admitted further that it was biased, but did not recind it.

FURTHER…

In this thread:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=72477

december cited an article that features remarks from the American Family Association and Phyllis Schlafly. Far from unbiased, as both that group and Schlafly are conservatives who have been quite vocal in anti-gay rhetoric.

He has also, in the aforementioned thread, said:

From FBI statistics on hate crimes, in 1999 Gays and Lesbians were 16.9%, making them the third highest group attacked(cite from http://www.hrc.org). This only includes reported attacks. We’re only supposedly less than 5% of the population by december’s cite, and yet we are 16.9% of those attacked.

Moreover, december’s remarks that there isn’t widespread aggression against gays, and the suggestion that the Human Rights Watch just assumed that gay students were subject to harassment was annoying. Not only do I have a large number of high school kids who come into my store, telling me their stories of the climate in their school, I remember all too well what it was like when I went to school. Kids using faggot, queer, and fag not only to slur people they thought or knew were gay, but as a general grouping of slurs for those they did not like or thought were weak.

Especially as I have had to prepare speeches lately about homophobia and civil unions for class, I am well aware of the climate out there, as well as information on these subjects.

I find it demeaning and insulting for someone to trot in, make claims they cannot support, and then jumps to another tack and claims injury.

By the American Heritage Dictionary, homophobia is defined as:

**
1.Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
2.Behavior based on such a feeling.**

I think december’s posts do show contempt for gay men and lesbians, and thus, I do think he is homophobic.

And you insulting me, especially when you haven’t been involved in the threads this Pit rant is about, makes you a hypocrite.

And if I am an asshole, at least I can SPELL it.

Kiss my agenda.

:wally

HASTUR, since someone else brought it up, I will also chime in that I feel you are both quick to insult others and quick to label those who don’t agree with you as homophobes – and these two things are not mutually exclusive. Take that as an insult if you will, but that is the impression you leave with me as well. And the threads you link to in an attempt to show that DECEMBER is a homophobe – which he pretty clearly is not, or if he is he’s in deep cover – IMO merely highlight your willingness to paste that distasteful label on someone at the drop of a hat, with little regard to how deeply offensive it might be and even less regard for whether it is warranted.

No doubt this opinion makes me a homophobe.

Oh, and since you have that dictionary handy, you might look up “hypocrite.” Failing to participate in the threads in question and yet having formed an opinion of your posting style does not meet the definition.

No, I don’t think it does.

The statement that I call people homophobes when they disagree with me is fallacious. In recent history, I can only think of referring to puddleglum and december in that vein.

Collectively, you lot are quick to jump on people en masse and take offense, claiming the poster had no reason to criticize. I feel I had every reason to feel criticized and slurred by december’s remarks, and am amazed at those jumping to his aid.

It does when someone claims I move to insulting quickly, and then they insult me with an obscenity the first chance they get.

HASTUR –

Fallacious or not, that is the impression you leave on at least some of us – and I don’t think SUA, WATER, and I (not to mention M.E.) would all have gotten that impression entirely without basis. Do with that information what you will.

First, I don’t know who “you lot” refers to – did I make the ever-elusive fictional “clique” and not realize it? Second, I don’t think I, for one, am quick to jump on people – I hate the occasional kick-fests that pop up in the Pit in the form of threads started merely to incite people to jump on a particular poster without justification. Third, I don’t think anyone has yet said that you have no reason (or right) to criticize whomever you want; I just personally feel that your criticism too often takes the form of either explicitly or implicitly accusing a person of homophobia, and that you always seem to keep your flamethrower primed and handy.

Actually, I’m not defending DECEMBER, I’m criticizing you – or rather admitting that the tendency referenced in the OP is one I have also noticed. Having accomplished that, and doubting that will thank me for it, I don’t think I have anything else to add to this thread, except a nitpick: Accusing you of being quick to insult and simultaneously insulting you is still not hypocritical, unless the poster claims not to be quick to insult himself, which WATER didn’t. Anyway.

I’ve stated my piece and have no desire to make you feel attacked or pick of fight with you, so excuse me while I bow out of this thread.

I wasn’t involved in those threads and I think you are not only an asshole, but an idiot too.

Guess I must be a hypocrite as well.

Whatever. :rolleyes:

From a dispassionate viewpoint I question your logic on this point. People can read posts and form opinions even though they don’t actively particpate. Entering a discussion midway doesn’t mean someone’s a hypocrite. Posted words and opinions are right out there for anyone with a modem to read. That reading may be invisible, especially compared to the hurly-burly of active discussion. But that doesn’t necessarily mean those opinions are invalid or hypocritical.

Hastur, if your’re reacting to the manner of “entering a discussion with an insult”, that’s one thing. But previous participation in ANY thread isn’t required to express an opinion midway.

This is a minor caveat in the bigger discussion but worth making IMO. The words we write are splashed right out there for all and sundry to read and frozen in time to boot. There are a lot more readers than responders: check out the “views” counts on threads. People read what we write here. The give-and-take of active debate is the tip of the iceberg in terms of the reading, thinking, forming opinions, impressions, etc. that goes on silently in the background. Some people may follow a discussion closely then jump in midstream.

The ONLY point I’m making is that involved discussions often attract involved readers. I’m just concerned that people not believe it’s “in from the start or get out”.

Veb

Nope, you are just a bitch who likes to follow me around in threads and insult me. That would be because you are a cretin. And a bully. Yet another instance of Diane jumping in on someone after others have started. What a gal.

:wally

The way people throw around the “Putz” smilie nowadays, Wally must be turning over in his grave.

It is exactly the aspect of entering the discussion with an insult which I was commenting on. I agree with your points, and appreciate the even handed way you brought them forth.
Bravo and thank you.

Point taken, and with the irritation I have been feeling, I hadn’t considered that. Thank you for your post. This is food for thought to be sure.

Nope, I’s jus’ calls 'em as I’s see 'em, and you my temper-tantrum, foot-stomping widdle booby are an asshole.

If I were the big, bad bully you say I am, I think you would see more of my so called attacks on other posters as well as yourself, but you don’t (trolls and Serlinoids are the exception). Hummmm. . . . ever stop to wonder why that is?

Before you start making claims of me “following you around” (don’t flatter yourself, sweety-pie), I suggest you do a search of the board and report back with an accurate count your total posts and how many received a response from me. Show a high enough percentage that proves that I follow you around the board and insult you. I may be off slightly, but I only recall two threads where I voiced my opinion of you. Paranoid much?

Either provide proof that I “follow me (you) around in threads and insult me (you)” or shut that yapping piehole of yours. I’ll assume your “proof” will arrive as quickly as most of your other B.S. claims of the past, so I won’t hold my breath.

Let me know if you would like me to do the research for you.

ok, i’m jumping in.

i read what seem to be most of the prior threads being referred to here. i think we’ve all got a lot of assumptions about the way other people feel that are based at least somewhat on real life experience, and i think some people are making hasty judgements of some other people.

Hastur’s overly defensive and calls other people homophobes at a moment’s notice, right? but december is afraid of being perceived as such because he knows in his mind that he isn’t really, so he overreacts when that label is applied to him. (please take all of this as IMHO, this is just how i see things) the greater issue at work here: we forget that in this case of hetero/homosexuality there is a clear distinction between the oppressor and the oppressed. talk about “White sox pride,” that is a matter of preference. if i prefer the Cubs over the ChiSox, that’s my choice and i’m welcome to take pride in it. sadly, here in the world, there are many heterosexual people out there who don’t like homosexual (btw, also, when i say “homosexual” i mean to include BGLT and all etc., just for ease of use) people for no reason other than their sexual orientation. even more sadly, said people frequently step beyond the bounds of just not liking these other people and go as far as to treat unkindly, harass, assault, and kill them. as the heterosexual one is by far the majority “opinion,” not to mention reinforced by centuries of civic and social tradition, that makes it oppressive. please do not ask me to draw the line between this distinction and the cubs/sox distinction, as i’m not sure at this point where it lies or how to find it.

point 1: Hastur is a member of the oppressed social group. december is a member of the oppressing social group. this is not to say (!!!) that Hastur himself is or is not personally oppressed, or that december himself does or does not personally oppress anyone. but it’s something that we all have to come to terms with. like it or not, i’m a middle class white heterosexual male. the fact that the two of them are members of different groups makes for some undercurrents of tension.

point 2: i dont see why anyone should be surprised that Hastur should be somewhat defensive about this issue. i don’t want to make it look like i’m trying to say i have any experience with what it’s like to be gay or to have to deal with that. but i can imagine it’s not easy. kids these days say anything that they don’t agree with is “gay.” december, what if “december” suddenly became an overwhelmingly prevalent pop culture phrase that was synonymous with “bad” or “weak”? would you feel a little threatened? that’s just the slightest taste of what it might be like.

point 3: pure guesswork on my part, but i know that personally, being male and heterosexual and being the kind of person who likes to think of himself as aware of these issues, i can get kind of sensitive myself whenever someone accuses me of being homophobic, or racist, which are things i try very hard not to be.

so here we have a flareup of emotions. as far as the “facts”? to me it looks pretty simple. some kids wanted to affirm their non-heterosexual identities and this activity was in some way sanctioned by the school. another kid, for whatever reasons, made it his business to feel that his heterosexual identity was being damaged or somehow mitigated by these activities, and wanted to be able to self-affirm his own identity in a similar manner. what he failed to take into account, however, is that “straight” people don’t NEED a special forum, or a “safe zone” to affirm their heterosexuality. they get that opportunity nearly every minute of every day. they flick on the tv, and unless they’re watching a “gay” show, their heterosexual identity is being safely and openly reinforced. so openly, in fact, that it doesn’t need to be mentioned. it’s implicit in everyday life.

i was one of those kids, sort of. when i was in high school i liked to bellyache about how pissed people would be if i tried to start a “White Student Union.” I’m glad I’ve grown up a little. Now i know that America IS a “White Student Union.”

go back and read the thread that Hastur just linked. he very clearly defines exactly what he thinks makes december a homophobe, and AFAK i haven’t seen anyone anywhere refute his actual reasoning. personally, i disagree. i don’t think december is a homophobe at all. i also think that a lot of very decent, very smart people are misled and misinformed and end up making flawed judgements and going through life with some very sad prejudices. i don’t know if december is one of those people. i doubt it. participation in the SDMB seems good for making smart people examine their prejudices, if nothing else. those people, the smart and misinformed ones, are the important people. they are the people whos minds can be changed. the stupid, ignorant, and misinformed people are a much more difficult case.

I agree that Hastur is quick to give insults, but I see little difference between him and puddleglum. Really its a part of most of the people who are really political on the SDMB. Its the ability to completely ignore facts and bring two views together by use of assumptions.

Really december is too inconsistent to be called anything.

What the hell, I don’t have to be anywhere for a few hours . . . .

I counted the last 400 threads in which you participated in since December 5, 2000. Would you like me to go back further?

What I found:

In this thread, http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=68718
I only referred to you in reply to another poster with this comment “Having read your answers, it appears that your claim to magic would better be defined as faith, much different than a few others (i.e. Hastur) who claim ability to cast spells that have measurable results.”

Damn! That was such an attack on you! :rolleyes:

Then the flames from http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=69812

Since that first one attacked you in no way, we’ll count this one as #1.

Then this one that YOU started, so we can’t really count that as “me following you around the board”, now can we? http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=70534

So, if you are claiming that I follow you around the board and attack you when proof shows that at least as far back to December 5, 2000, and at least the last 400 threads you participated in, I cast the first flame ONCE, now TWICE counting this thread.

Yep, you’re right. I’m the big bad bully that follows you around the board. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Like I said, paranoid much?