ETA: I enjoyed your snark but it is an established fact that a heroin user, given pure heroin in a clean, safe setting, can remain quite healthy and problem free. That is what I meant by “documented facts”. But thanks for your snark.
…I wasn’t being snarky and I’m sorry you read it that way. Several people in this thread made the exact same points as me but you ignored them. I simply stopped beating around the bush and was as direct with you as I could have been.
But by all means bow out or stay involved in the conversation: its entirely up to you.
Probably almost all of it. Even the streetwalkers have smartphones, email and can post free ads. Smartphones probably take a lot of women off of the street which is not to say that their situation is any more pleasant.
I would make a large distinction too, but my broader point was that there’s a large Grey area between dating, marriage and prostitution, and many people fairly comfortably inhabit that grey zone. Street prostitution, of course, sucks.
Because prostitution is illegal in almost all of the US, it’s going to be VERY hard to get accurate information: there’s just no reason FOR prostitutes to report their activities and some very good reasons NOT to report their activities. New Zealand, where prostitution is completely legal, is probably the best source we have. Plus we have a lot of NGOs which make money by “helping” prostitutes which have a vested interest in inflating numbers and misrepresenting prostitution.
I don’t know any prostitutes personally (that I know of, I’m not one to pry) but I DO know of an ex-prostitute named Maggie McNeill who has done an excellent job of debunking a lot of the bullshit about prostitution, particularly the statistical kind) by keeping records of various bullshit claims and linking them with their appropriate debunking. (She’s also an ex-librarian, which probably explains her skill at it.) Here’s her “Frequently Told Lies” column that covers a lot of it. I didn’t see anything on that page that covers a specific link between drug and prostitution, but there IS a link that indicates that most prostitutes do it for the money, Lebowski.
There’s no simple answer to that. I have known well-paid executive secretaries who freelanced on the side. Only time will tell.
But the important phrase in your question is “better paying.” These ladies could all go get factory jobs right now, there’s a labor shortage, but they’d be working 12 hours a day on an assembly line for peanuts.
Yes. Dana (she has passed away now) was pretty much an oldschool 70’s-TV-show hooker. (I knew her in the 80s, though.) Like the lady that CountBlucher knew, she was sweet and kind; in actual fact a “hooker with a heart of gold.”
I knew her because she was good friends with many of my other friends. She herself was suppoirting a family and a heroin habit. She was very stable, her husband and she owned a home that was always well-kept and cozy.
I don’t know if hookers at that time had the same freedom to be proud exactly of their vocation that sex workers have now; however, I don’t think she had any hangups about it. Her customers were mostly sweet older gentlemen whom she’d known for years.
She never told me about any abuse in her childhood. It’s certainly possible, but somehow I think not.
Refuting the premise “there is some realistic truth to the idea that just about no woman/girl would willingly let a strange man stick his penis in her mouth or fuck her in the ass, unless that woman/girl was in a position in her life where she felt so desperate to get the money to get her drugs, this was the only way”. There are plenty of women who will gladly do the above for free without a drug habit to support.
Um, yeah, with men they want to do those things with. :dubious: For reasons of excitement and sexual attraction. No women in her early 20s will willingly let various, strange 50 and 60 year old men ejaculate into her mouth without there being an element of desperation at play.
Once again, check out a Spring Break resort or any other site were people congregate in groups for adult hedonistic behavior. Women are not inherently any less promiscuous than men and plenty of women in their early 20s are attracted to all sorts of men. There is no desperation required to engage in a lot of random, commit free sex.
Guess you have never been to a bar at closing time and watched pretty girls leave with losers they just met that night. Hell, I’ve been that loser and I didn’t need to drug them. You do understand that a girl can just like sex for gradification purposes. It’s just that when they behave like men we call them sluts.
That is still someone a girl (intoxicated by the way) desired to have sex with. I guarantee that none of those drunk pretty girls were leaving with fat, stinky 55 year old slobs. My point firmly stands.