Hmmm, unless I’ve completely missed something…I believe you guys use the same term too many times with out ever thinking of it’s definition. SD-Star Destroyer. A vehicle capable of the destruction of an entire star…which would theoretically be able to do more than the Death Star(maybe it was a bad name) At anyrate, This simply gigantic ship versus the Enterprise. Which I admit isn’t that small, but it’s all relative. A single weapon may be able to do little damage, but combine many of them, and well…you get the point. Maybe I’m out there on this one, let’s hope not:)
O-kay…
Oh yay, I can be the first to say…
Huh?
Kitty
[slight hijack] Welfy, are you as confused by the op as I am ? If so wanna go get a drink someplace ? [/slight hijack]
I don’t get it either.
Sounds good to me!
Maybe they were trying to say that in numbers we are stronger? I dunno. shrugs
I think we all need to get a drink someplace after this.
Total stream of consciousness. Made no sense whatsoever. What exactly were you trying to accomplish by this post?
Not only is this thread pretty much a complete non sequitur, but Neo21 is also obviously wrong about the destructive power of a “Star Destroyer”. You’re taking that term way too literally, Neo–it’s not a “ship which can destroy a whole star”, but “a starship (a vessel capable of interstellar travel) which functions as a destroyer”. I mean think about it, if the Empire had whole fleets of ships, each capable of destroying whole suns, do you think either they or the Rebels would give a hoot about some “Death Star”?
The guy was making a (silly) joke… SD = Straight Dope.
sheesh!
Ohhh-kaaay.
Thanks for sharing that.
Veb
I just got email on this, Neo posted to the wrong thread.
I would remove it but now that there’s comment it would be an even bigger non sequitur than it is now.
Hopefully Neo21 will post his comment to the correct thread, which is, of course, “Enterprise vs. Star Destroyer.”
your humble TubaDiva
Administrator
I agree, and I’m locking this off.