Your memory’s faulty :), so there’s that. In '08 you actually have it almost exactly backwards. Obama won the earliest primaries, so he had a lead after january; he won more delegates on Super Tuesday; he swept the rest of the February primaries. He added slightly to his lead in March. Clinton only won in April, when it was too late. (There’s an asterisk, which was that no one knew how to count MI and FL.) But Obama’s big push was in February, when he got about 125 more delegates than she did; and if there was momentum at the end, it was Clinton’s.
As for Sanders, he did fall behind early thanks to all the Southern primaries, but he also fell behind late, losing pretty badly in most of the primaries, and all of the big-state primaries, beginning with NY in mid-April: NY by 15 points, MD by 30, PA by 12, CA by 7. His best streak was in late March/early April after Super Tuesday, in about the middle of the campaign, but then he fell off sharply after that.
And yes, ultimately they did both endorse and campaign for the winner, but boy oh boy they got there in very different ways.
If my memory’s faulty, apologies. Based on the totatlity of their careers as I understand them, they both have large egos, IMO – probably about average for politicians at the senator/governor/cabinet level.
I didn’t hear this interview. The most impressive/moving thing Buttegieg said when I heard him in person over the summer–and he said a lot of good things–had to do with Trump’s (and the Republicans’) desire to “go back in time.” Buttegieg said that a lot of people didn’t want to go back in time, back to the fifties or whenever we like to pretend that life was perfect, and that he didn’t either–but, he added, “In my case I CAN’T go back. It would mean the destruction of my family, in effect the destruction of my life as I know it.” It was an interesting–and sobering–perspective, well expressed. Wondering if he said anything like it in the interview… Maybe I should listen to it already!
That’s me. I might join a right-of-center party in one of the rational democracies. In the U.S. I’m happy to root for leftists like AOC because the most radical of her proposals ain’t happening anytime soon anyway.
Of course the #1 left-v-right issue: Should the government act to protect citizens and consumers from the worst excesses of corporate greed? is no longer controversial in the rational democracies, nor among voters in the U.S.A. The big "left-v-right issue around the world is Hatred. I spoke with an old man from England two days ago. He hates Jews; he hates blacks; he hates Muslims; he hates gays; he hates “liberals”; and he hates people who speak truth about Trump. (Our discussion got a little animated.) The present Italian government is a coalition of a left-wing party and a right-wing party. What issue unifies them?
Trump supporters are not opposed to consumer finance protection, and not opposed to subsidized education for white children. Recently Trump supporters in Utah and Idaho — the very epicenter of homophobic Flyoverland — carried pickets asking for Medicaid expansion.
No; the big left-v-right issues for today’s American voters aren’t economic. They’re about Hatred.
I’m not surprised that none of the former staffers cared to commit professional suicide by commenting on the record. The fact that her staff has one of the highest turnover rates in the Senate does suggest there might be an issue here.