Here it is, she's been asking for it, the pitting of Quiddity Glomfuster

hey, leave Matt Russell out of this! :wink:

You are right…I don’t blame her for having a lot of posts in this thread. It might cut down on the time she spends posting, though, if she would be more direct and stop leading people around in circular arguments. The whole bit about the gender thread was just silly. Just go back, read the thread again, and admit that you misrepresented what it said. Say you were mistaken. Say you read it quickly & missed the point. Say whatever, but don’t spend post after post arguing about something so obvious.

I’d say tragic, really. Considering who she was when she posted here, she must have had to process an astonishing amount of self-loathing before she got to the point where she could come out. I can’t bring myself to gloat over something like that. It’s not an experience anyone deserves.

On the other hand, I can and will gloat over that bigotted shit Joe Cool losing his wife to another woman. That completely fucking rocks.

This is the funniest post in the entire thread.

When people have called for your head in a basket, I don’t think that’s exactly what they meant.

:smiley:

I’ve always wanted to name a cat John McLaughlin. Because they always have the final say anyhow, right?

I concur.

I’d say “I’ll be here all week”, but I’m not some of the other folks in this thread.

absolutely!
now, we’ve had the cute kitty references covered, the long ago poster references, the stand up comedien routine, I think we can stick a fork in this horse.

Sure, and I agree. However, bear in mind that this is a person who has consistently and loudly insisted that she doesn’t give a damn what us “pixels on a screen” think or say about her. If you don’t detect a trace of irony here, then what can I say, you probably need to check the polarity on your irony meter. :wink:

Yes, that was exactly my thought as well.

I’m very sorry for the highjack.

You missed:

Gaudere’s Law
Peter Principle
Godwin’s Law
Strawman Arguments
circular logic
irony
Ockham’s Razor

It’s been a blast!

We are just missing gratuitous nudity.

(.)(.)

ok, now we’re done.

)[sub][sub]*[/sub][/sub](

So . . . it’s tragically delicious!

You might encounter some resistance.

If the nudity doesn’t kill the thread, the bad puns will.

They never have yet.

I must admit that there is some truth in that statement.

Easy tiger. Those sort of statements are hard to find in this thread. Actually, it may be the only one in here.

Now, about those scripts folks are talking about…