Hey America! Wake Up !

Well, maybe you guys should invade. That’ll get our attention.

Wait for winter. You’ll be able to skate right into Wisconsin and steal all our cheese before we even knew what hit us…

In fact, John is Malcolm Fraser’s first name – his name in full is John Malcolm Fraser. However, he is known as Malcolm Fraser. Presumably the person briefing Jimmy Carter found that John was the first name, and thought that Malcolm Fraser (like most people) used his first name rather than his second name.

Too many jokes. Must rest now.

Oh come on, you know Canada! It’s where we get our discount medications!

Look at it this way: the news organs are produced in the big cities. So you’ll get complete coverage of big-city elections, but the major organs will rarely give the suburban elections much coverage.

Canada is a suburb of the US, so the coverage is just about what you’d expect. Look in the free papers just inside the grocery stores, there should be some information there.

WHO?!?*

Maybe there was something really important they had to report instead, like where the next season of “Survivor” was going to take place.**
*JOKE!

**Not a joke. This is what passes for news in the US.

Does this in any way affect the bacon supply? I get my maple syrup from Vermont, so that’s not a consideration.

you must admit, its pretty easy to overlook Canada. . .all tucked away down there.

[/homer]

That must be one impressive merkin.

(BTW, if it please you any, grienspace, C-SPAN carried the CBC election broadcast, and my local newspaper (located nowhere near the Canadian border) had the results the next day.)

Blair is a close ally.
Chirac is controversial is many would like to see him go (I can just see all the smug grins over on Fox).
Sharon is an ally (kinda) in a volitile area.
Fox? You give us too much credit. I took me two reading to to realize you were talking about the Mexican president and not the network.

I don’t know what you’re talking aboot. :slight_smile:

Actually, in the Canadian political spectrum, the Liberals are pretty much centrist. Compared to the American spectrum, even the Conservative party is kinda left wing, however. The Liberals should be able to govern for a while with an unofficial alliance with the NDP, as the BQ will vote with them on some issues at least. One issue which hasn’t been mentioned is that although the Liberal/NDP combination fails to make an absolute majority, what really counts is a majority of MPs actually present and voting for any given vote.

I see this as benefiting same-sex marriage rights, as the NDP are in favour, while the Liberals have been pretty much neutral to avoid offending potential voters), and can now say that the NDP forced them into it. (I’m all in favour of any combination of consenting adults being able to marry. If it’s against your religion, fine, don’t do it in your church, and let the rest of us do what WE feel is morally correct.)

As for the paper ballot thing, admittedly it’s much easier when there’s only one item on the ballot. :smiley:

You’ll be able to skate right into Wisconsin and steal all our cheese before we even knew what hit us…

We’re screwed when Canada discovers Atkins!

:smiley:

Cheap Viagla.

Don’t worry, few of them will, because of the 1000% markup on books up there ("$3.95, $7.95 in Canada").

In today’s NY Times, it’s on page A6, same page it was yesterday. Nice long articles. Granted, yesterday they had a rare right-across-the-whole-page headline on the Iraqi handover, and all the articles save one on the front page were about that.

I coulda sworn this said “butt the major organs will rarely give the suburban erections much coverage.”

I am a troubled individual…

We’ve been asking ourselves that for years… something in the beer, I think.

For what it’s worth grienspace: I’m in Oregon and I’ve been following the elections. I don’t often watch TV News, but www.cbc.ca has had some good coverage for me --as well as the rather long thread in GD :wink:

There are some of us down here that are interested but we don’t bother with TV News anymore because we’re tired of hearing cherry picked news for ratings. I wouldn’t expect to bother watching local news for that coverage and I’d be shocked if I did see it on National news (outside of a blip-vert style report).

Several of us were talking about it at work the other day as well.

Don’t write the US people off yet. Many of us are aware of the rest of the planet. Our broadcasts don’t always relect our interests.

They reflect the interests of the people who make the broadcasts.