Now, I’m asking this question on the basis that female ejaculation is a real phenomenon and that the ejaculate, normally, is not urine. If either of these points are wrong, then the question really doesn’t matter.
I have watched a fair amount of pornography in my day and have seen many instances of female ejaculation, usually a little squirt with a force of a little less than the average male ejaculation, and lasting for only a second or so. I watched one actress named Cytherea that is the Peter North of females. When she has proper stimulation, she lets rip a stream of fluid that travels five feet or so and lasts for at least five seconds and she goes into a series of convulsions that last long after she is finished secreting whatever the liquid is.
My question is, is she urinating? It seems possible that, while female ejaculation is real, this actress is just urinating and passing it off as the most copious and intense female ejaculation in history. I’ve seen the topic debated to no end on pornography-related message boards, which are really just shouting matches that get nowhere. I was hoping that there has been a little more research into the subject since Cecil published his column, or someone has experienced this High-Speed Female Ejaculation first-hand that can validate it.
I think I have experienced what you are talking about but I can’t say for sure if it’s unine or not although I would say at least of it is.
Mrs. 74westy dug this up the day after our first little personal discovery. Being a feminist, she got something with a proper feminist slant. It’s long but I think a fair summary would be:
However, I personally performed a definitive procedure on a blocked Bartholin duct (after several other procedures including a marsupialization by a real doc) using the cap of a Bic pen sanitized with 20-year-old Laphraoig (we couldn’t find Betadyne solution OTC in any British chemist, and I had to do something or else she would have suffered on the plane back to the US).
I can say one thing for sure. There can be a lot of fluid in there.
Well, by a lot, I mean a lot. With a blocked duct, a woman can get about a half pint of fluid in her per side without even noticing it. Squirting it out is just a matter of Kegel exercizes.
20-year old Laphroaig? Where on earth did you get that, epepke? The standard bottling is 10-year-old, which IMO is superb stuff, and the 15-year-old is even better. But 20-year-old … wow!
Incidentally the adjective I’ve heard most commonly used to describe Laphroaig is “medicinal”. Nice to see that you’re taking that literally…
Found it in a tiny little shop in London. Either it was some sort of special issue, or they defrauded me. But it was damn good. I forgot to say that some of it was administered orally as a general anesthetic, and there were several toasts afterward to commemorate the success of the procedure.
If you really want a treat, try the 1978 bottling of Aardbeg. I only know one place on Earth to get that.
I wouldn’t take anything you see in a porno movie to be real, ever. You see whatever the director decides will sell the video, not what really happens during sex.
As regards ‘real’ female ejaculation, if you work on your Kegel exercises well enough, you can do it very easily - with or without arousal. It’s just emptying the glands on either side of the vagina.
This is a fallacy that is propagated on porn sites wherein they inject a foreign liquid substance into the vaginal cavity. The female then contracts the muscles to eject the liquid with great force, simulating “ejaculation”.
While this would qualify as “ejaculation” in the strict sense of the word, it is not ejaculation as a direct sexual stimulus as occurs in the male.
Sometimes, during intercourse, women will experience a relaxation of the urethral sphincter and leak urine without realizing it. The vagina also has the ability to excrete copious quantities of lubricating mucus.
The Greater Vestibular glands, also called the Bartholin Glands, secrete mucus during heightened sexual arousal for the purposes of vaginal lubrication during intercourse. It is possible to place pressure on these glands with a resultant expulsion of fluid. This is not, however, “ejaculation” as a direct sexual response as in the male.
