A new low, even for the Republicans. I don’t care nutball this guy is, if the GOP doesn’t kill that ad immediately and censure him with a vengeance, I’ll…
not vote for them in the next election, which is what I was going to do anyway. But this is getting ridiculous.
Jeez, why don’t they just show a picture of Hillary with horns and a little Hitler mustache drawn in with a Sharpie pen?
I’ve got no dog in this particular fight, being locate pretty far from upstate New York, but political ads these days seem to be about as factually reliable as your average Internet chain letter. In fact, nore and more often, adverts tend to make me want to vote against the campaign that placed the ad more than for them.
Nonsense. I think he needs to try harder. Why go down with quiet dignity when you can go out screaming and flailing like a jackass.
I think we need ads accusing Hillary of lesbianism and murder. Now that I think of it, people tend not to vote for aliens. Give us ads proclaiming Hillary is an alien with acid for blood and a second bitey mouth inside her first mouth. Even better idea: Ann Coulter as the new campaign spokesperson.
Come on John. Do you want to go out like a fart in a breeze? I think not! Let’s light that bad boy and go out in a blaze of ahem glory!
The way you worded your post, it sounds like you’re implying that, if the guy actually had a chance of beating Clinton, the ad might somehow be acceptable or understandable.
I’m pretty sure that’s not what you think, but someone who didn’t know you better might be forgiven for misinterpreting your post.
It’s defensible to argue that Senator Clinton’s policies have (or would) leave us less-well defended from terror attacks than the policies her opponent would presumably champion.
It’s utterly INdefensible to make that argument in a way that suggests the Senator and bin Laden are linked or that one supports or approves of the other. Crappy, crummy, dogshit-level advertising. I don’t know who would take a clown like that seriously.