I KNOW! 
I seriously don’t know why that one scene makes it for me, but IT DOES
I;m gonna spoiler it a bit here.
What you cant see in the trailer is that the water is tainted with the SARS virus :eek:
You just *know *there’s going to be a guy in the movie who tries to surf it, too.
The reason people didn’t is because the review verdict was, “This isn’t what you wanted a movie called ‘Snakes on a Plane’ to be.”
I’m pretty sure 2012 is going to be exactly what it looks like. If Ebert’s Thursday review even MENTIONS the word “plot,” though, I’ll skip it.
Wait, what about the scene where the RV is dodging giant flaming chunks of stuff falling from the sky? That doesn’t interest you? 
I don’t know why but the now overused trope of “Falling Famous Landmark” is really turning me off. I don’t want to see ChristoftheAndes or St.Peters or theEiffelTower crashing. just me I guess.
The director of the worst of the Mummy films and GI Joe is directing a remake of When Worlds Collide.
So does anyone have any idea what is supposed to fuck up the Earth so badly in the 2012 flick? It looks like more than just a mere asteroid strike.
The Mayans are back… and this time, they’re pissed!
Its all the hollow spots in a post peak oil Earth.
And if anybody answers this seriously, could they please hide their answers so as not to spoil it?
My understanding is… A planetary alignment starts pulling the Earth apart.
BTW, those of you who want to see this really need to check out 10.5. Awesomely terrible, with some good disaster porn.
Yeah, watching the trailer made me flash to Mark Wahlberg trying to outrun the wind. The only redeeming thing about the trailer was that it was slightly less bad than the hilariously awful “Legion,” in which God is the bad guy, and the heroes battle him with assault rifles. (Actually, looking at that description, it sounds kind of awesome, but no, the movie really looks sad.)
I couldn’t agree with the OP more. You people are the reason Michael Bay has a career. Never have I been so ashamed of the SD.
I really really hope they meant to make this thing tongue-in-cheek cheesy cause that extended scene just had me laughing all the way through it.
Skyscrapers tipping over like trees (I can just hear the 911 conspiracy theorists now, “see, that’s how a building is supposed to fall down”), the clever little safe pathway for the family to escape on, etc.
I just giggled through the whole thing.
I saw a trailer for that for the first time last Saturday. It kind of reminds me of The Prophecy
Congratulations, you’re better than me. Go translate some Aeschylus.
I saw Snakes on a Plane!
No snark here. I’m thankful that I have the ability to enjoy great deep art-house flicks and crazy mindless disaster epics like this. And I’m pretty sure I’m going to really enjoy it, not just enjoy it in a “so bad it’s good” way.
Possibly one of the biggest jokes in that is that it has single-frame shots of the actors in the film spliced in randomly.
Plot? What’s that!?
I’m just wondering why they didn’t save it for, say. 2011. Now we have much more time to get ready for the apocalypse! And I’m glad John Cusack didn’t run into Nicholas Cage driving the other way.
So they were going to make a movie based on Worlds in Collision, but it was too scientifically accurate for them?
Thanks, you just broke my stupid meter.