The makeup is really off putting on practically every picture of her. Same with the lass in the PJ commercial.
They’re using pretty models now to sell products and/or services? ALERT THE PRESSES.
They are blatantly stealing images from French TV to promote weight loss scams. I wonder why the network where she works doesn’t try to stop these ads. You can’t really think that she or the network is being paid to endorse weight loss scams.
Young woman on college from home commercial = pretty.
Melissa Theuriau = pretty on a whole other level.
Yup, and higher up that list is Sleeps with Butterflies, whose opinion about how men react to attractive women is likely colored by the fact that she is quite attractive herself.
Meh, she’s okay. I’ll take Crystal from the Microsoft Windows 7 ad over her any day of the week.
It could backfire on them. Guys, you do not want to look directly at this woman. I recommend one of those pinhole boxes like you use for viewing an eclipse.
Damn man, you can’t bring up a new girl without pics. Read the handbook sometime about this stuff man, shit.
How about a video?
Yes, videos are better than mere pictures.
Also yes, she’s quite attractive, still better than the OP girl but still not better than my pajama-ed girl.
You say this, yet her picture is not in the Doper Picture Collection. Unfair!
You should watch Gossip Girl. This Crystal chick looks a lot like Leighton Meester.
Crystal gets a meh from me - she looks like a typical slightly annoying British girl to me. I walk past hundreds like her on the Tube.
We now return you to your scheduled objectification of the female gender… 
This was hilarious. Thank you, sir! 
Yeah, well I remember the good old days when sleeps would share with us all the pictures of her with her cock. It was so pretty that everyone wanted to touch it. Men, women, even the little kids were in awe. And then some asshole broke it. We still mourn for sleeps’ cock.
I do miss that cock.
If I may inject a note of undue seriousness into the conversation…One element that seems to me to be a difference in the approaches of (heterosexual) men and women to an attractive member of the appropriate sex is that – and this is of course a generalization – men want to know the name of the object of their interest, whereas women may admire the person or image in a distant sort of way but they’re not serious about wanting to know the name or form any sort of even the most miniscule, temporary attachment. It’s not just a matter of wanting to Google the chick later – guys always want to know who that chick is, what’s her name? Women tend more toward “the poolboy is cute.”
I’m not really sure why this should be this way (assuming for the sake of argument I’m onto something). Maybe it’s because men are more used to having to make the effort of pursuit, and even someone they will never meet and have no chance of pursuing still triggers their impulse to gather data about any possible love interest, even if fantasy. The female approach is more realistic, of course.
Edit: this very thread provides an example – some of the men are asking “who is that? I must know,” and Sleeps with Butterflies is calling her “a halfway decent looking girl on the internet” even after the name is known.
Haha, what a coincidence! Just today I was thinking, “man that girl is gorgeous” after seeing her picture 8 billion times. I googled “consumertipsdigest.com girl” and didn’t get anything . . . thanks for the name!
I’m kind of surprised she’s French. She looks a lot like girls I went to school with . . . and I’m from Georgia . . .
Oh, and I’m a hetero chick. But she is stunning. Totally my “type.”
And holy cow she’s a for-real legit journalist too! This girl has got the whole package.