I was trying to find a cite via Google about Leslie Van Houten (of the infamous Manson family) and how she’d been charged with 1st degree murder even though she stabbed just one victim (and inflicted only post-mortem wounds). I found a rather shocking sight (which obviously I won’t link here). According to the website’s owner
I’m not anti free speech – but I’m not entirely (100%) certain the images the site’s owner provides falls under that realm. The only moral judgment I’m going to make is this: The last sentence of the above quote should read: “…The public will pay to have their morbid curiosity sated by following any of this site’s sponsors (like Amazon and buy a celebrity’swill.com).
[li]Posting (obviously) leaked (30+ year old) murder scene photos from court/police files is legal?[/li]
[li]Graphic, uncensored images of the Manson Family’s victims have been on the net for 6 years?[/li]
[li]I seriously doubt the site’s owner has the legal permission to play original Beatles and Mamas & Papas background music. If I were to report that fact to his site’s host, would they even bother looking into it? [/li]
Has anyone heard an outcry from the pubic, victim’s rights groups or the 2 sisters (mentioned above) to get the host (Adelphia) to cease hosting the site?[/ul]