My wild-assed guess - much more common among men than women, and caused by a guy not wanting to seem too forward to the woman (or women) he’s taking a picture with by resting his hand on them (especially on bare skin).
I think I have done it in the past with children that I was socially expected to hug, but I didn’t feel close enough to them and/or was too afraid of being seen as potentially touching them in the wrong way that I ended up doing this.
I don’t understand why it’s considered enough of a phenomenon that it has to have a name or a back story. What robert_colulmbia and Cat Whisperer say seem logical enough.
Do it all the time. Yeah, it’s lame, but the conventions of photography require one to affect a pose of intimacy that is not necessarily present in real life. If I am in a bar, I don’t stand around with my hands all around women’s waists or shoulders, but if someone wanted to take a photo, such a pose is standard, but feels transgressive. Hence the compromise of the hover hand.
It feels transgressive because we’ve all conscious of having seen someone misjudge the moment, put a hand on someone and get that perfect stink-eye coupled with a sort of frozen rigidity that attractive young women seem to conjure when their personal space is violated.
I personally have been seen to do this or similar when forced to pose with people because of my red-hot, super-sweaty hands. Seriously I will leave soaking wet palm prints on people, no one likes that.
I’m sorry, but deliberately not touching Summer Glau when the opportunity is there is just a sign of insanity. Dude in pic 1 is insane!
On the other (ahem) hand, sometimes hover-hand happens because the hand is still moving into place and you’re using a fast lens. I’ve seen that happen.