Back story: My wife was diagnosed with scleroderma four years ago. Sclerodermais an incurable, progressive, debilitating auto-immune disease that causes damage to the lungs, kidneys and digestive system, as well as causing the skin to become stiff and hard. Painful ulcers on the fingers are common due to poor circulation. The upshot is, even though she takes large amounts of pain-killers including fentanyl and hydrocodone, she still has breakthrough pain.
My mother loves her almost as much as I do, and she truly would do anything to relieve my wife’s pain. Mom was once a registered nurse, so she knows how medical science works.
However, she recently heard about a lady in her church that has scleroderma, and tried an alternative treatment known as the Antibiotic Protocol (AP). Within 1 month, her finger ulcers were gone, and with several months her disease had stabilized.
There is no scientific evidence that antibiotic therapy works, and a clinical study in 2004confirmed that. Yet AP is all over the scleroderma support websites, and many people are clamoring to try it, even though their doctors do not support it.
So I just got off the phone with Mom, and I vainly tried to explain that we had no way of knowing what caused her friends apparent remission, and without data, we don’t know how many others got no relief at all. Her reply was, “Why not just try it? What could it hurt?”
Why not indeed? Because my wife’s doctoris the the director of the scleroderma research center at Boston University Medical Center, and is a world renowned expert on this disease. He does not support this treatment, so we would have to leave him and find another doctor who supports a protocol with no scientific justification.
It seems foolhardy to abandon the best doctor we could hope to find on such flimsy anecdotal evidence, and go off on a wild goose chase pursuing a treatment with nothing but anecdotal evidence to support it.
But Mom became upset when I explained all this to her, and she hung up on me, and now we are both upset. I appreciate her caring, and I know she only wants the best for Mrs. Fear, but how can I get her to understand why we have to use reason to choose the doctor and the therapy for this illness, and not desperation and unwarranted faith in the anecdotal stories of strangers?