We hear stories once in a while about how someone got too close to a chimp, and ended up with some involuntary, unscheduled amputations–but Jane Goodall has made her life studying chimps, and somehow never managed to tick one off, at least, not seriously enough to make any news. What’s her secret?
I don’t think Goodall probably inserts herself into an enviornment incredibly gradually. That, coupled with her experience and sense of chimps mannerisms and body language, probably goes a long ways towards keeping her whole.
People who have had unfortunate tangles with primates probably interrupted the primates environment dramatically, and/or didn’t have the awareness or wisdom to get while the getting was good.
This, plus a big dose of luck. She’s always known and accepted that doing fieldwork around chimps means taking a risk of being hurt by them. (I wonder if her acceptance of that paradoxically means she’s more relaxed when she’s around them, and thus less likely to make the chimps tense and nervous?)
D’oh! I mean “I THINK Goodall probably inserts herself…gradually.” Started the sentence with one thought and ended with another.
Keep in mind that she is interacting with wild chimps, not ones that have been locked up for years. These wild animals interact peaceably with lots of other species without tearing them apart.
In the films I have seen of her she is always crouched down or sitting on the ground in a passive manner, and never threatening them in any way. A pissed off chimp could easily attack her, but why would they?
If she doesn’t threaten them, and they have a way to get away as opposed to attacking defensively, the risk really isn’t that high, and remember that she is an expert in chimp behavior and can tell if there is problem chimp that she needs to be weary of.
I have worked around chimps in a large animal park and they were rarely aggressive and can be very curious. If a chimp felt threatened or nervous it would keep it’s distance. Chimps are smart animals and will run away from a fight if it suits them.
…or are keeping them in unnatural environments (like a suburban home) and treating them not as wild animals who should be respected as such, but as “family members.”
I’m guessing she isn’t hanging out with “crazy cat lady” raised chimps that are sick and tired of being treated like a human baby when in actuality, they are chimp teenagers and just want to fight and fuck.
Also, she may have a discretely placed assistant or grad student armed with a rifle hanging in the background. My impression is that she’s rarely alone in the field.
And that reminds me of those pesky rumors …
Which, if true, could be what keeps her safe. Or, it could have the exact opposite effect.
The posts above have the right answer. If you watch her films she does explain how she managed to get near the apes.
1 Goodall knew ape body language and very carefully only used non-threatening body language. For instance she would not make direct eye contact which for some animals is unnerving.
2 Goodall would eat the local flora and showed complete disinterest in the apes. She never really went towards the apes. She kept herself in their vicinity, they grew accustomed to her non-threatening presence and her smell, and the apes eventually came closer and closer to her, eventually the apes came right up to Goodall and even touched her. Apes are curious animals. Only over a long period of time did the apes come to accept Goodall in their vicinity.
3 Some apes did aggressively charge at Goodall. Goodall DID NOT flee nor did she try to defend herself. She used passive ape behavior, did not make eye contact, and behaved with total submission to the charging apes. The was enough to keep the aggressive apes from actually physically attacking her. The apes who would charge at her were the dominant alpha males and once the alpha males were satisfied with her submissiveness they were satisfied and would ignore her.
Goodall was attacked by a large aggressive male chimp named Frodo to the point of nearly having her neck broken in 1989. She kept a very great distance from Frodo afterwards. This same chimp also killed a 14 month old infant in 2002 and the Tanzanian National Parks Department seriously gave consideration to euthanizing him.
At first, I thought you meant a chimp infant. But, it was in fact a human infant and Frodo started to eat the infant as well.
That’d be one dead chimp.
Yes, I should have clarified that. The baby was brought into the territory by the niece of one of the researchers. Frodo at one time had been the alpha male in his troop, and although he had been supplanted as leader, he was still extraordinarily aggressive for a wild chimpanzee.
That’s one of the most disturbing things I’ve heard in a long time. Was the researcher related to the infant too? I assume the niece was young? Too young to know that was an extremely inadvisable thing to do?
Here’s a good article on Frodo, including that incident. Note that it’s not so much “inadvisable” as it is “flat-out forbidden” –
[QUOTE=National Geographic]
…the mother [the wife of one of the park attendants] probably knew that park rules bar children under 12 from visiting the park, and she almost certainly was aware of the mortal danger posed by chimps.
[/QUOTE]
Haha! That article says that Frodo attacked Gary Larson:
Well, that is one fucked up chimp then.
If anyone is still interested in this question there is a new documentary out about her research:
Interesting that the article talks about how Goodall supposedly “upper her scientific game” during her work with chimps.
Since this thread was started, it’s become evident that her game has suffered, and her reputation along with it.