If you want to go back in the thread and read the whole exchange me and the other poster were having, feel free. Or if you want to make a point or challenge anything I posted, feel free.
People dressed in Black Bloc outfits who shout “We are anarchists!” while turning what was a peaceful protest into a riot are Democrats. Got it.
You fucking moron.
So, the gay guy who only dates Black men is a bigot, the rioters were of the right leaning variety and no one is trying to suppress free speech?
Do y’all honestly believe the things y’all type?
Who someone chooses to date says pretty much nothing about whether they might have some bigoted beliefs.
Who said the rioters were conservative? They were assholes. Most of the protesters were peaceful, but a few violent assholes ruined it.
You kiss your goat with that mouth?
Yes. Yes, they do.
Still waiting for your cite that the violent offenders in this instance were campus Democrats.
He’s a part of one of the left’s “oppressed” groups and exclusively dates people apart of another one of the left’s “oppressed” groups. Sure, anyone and everyone holds some kind of “bigotted” beliefs, but the contention here was that Milo is a bigot. And I’m curious as to how one figures that.
Icarus said he wouldn’t discount it.
Based on things that he’s said. Many things. I don’t know what’s in his, or anyone’s, heart, but he has said many bigoted things. I think it’s reasonable to call someone who says many bigoted things, without apologizing for them, a bigot.
That’s a bit different than what you said. But hey, exaggerate and hyperbolize away, if you like. I won’t pretend that there isn’t plenty of that from liberal Dopers as well.
The stupid is strong with this one.
I have zero proof of course, but this little controversy was spread far and wide before the fact. I strongly suspect you’re dealing not with the pool of 38,000 UC Berkeley students, but rather the pool of 7.65 million San Francisco Bay Area residents. Sadly we do have our share of anarchist whackadoos that are happy to BART over from SF or drive up from San Jose to smash shit ( I’ve personally known a couple such misguided idiots when I was in college ).
You know the university didn’t invite anyone? 'Twas a campus club.
I’m copacetic about it. Under freedom of speech and association we (on both sides) in turn have ways to make the venues who back down in the face of peaceful, if confrontational, protest know what *we *think of that.
Milo is an awful human being, one who delights in hurting others. How does this make him one of the “best gays?”
Who ranks them?
As opposed to “only” wanting them put into conversion camps or mental institutions? And that doesn’t even consider what the “alt right” wants.
Seems a little hypocritical and ironic to use this as a defense.
Yes. That was my point. I was saying that iiandyiiii’s assertion about university’s being obligated was irrelevant.
Ehhhh… No.
See, it would be one thing if those violent, unlawful, anarchist protesters were running the show. If our president got his start from being in those protests, and on his way to the white house constantly showed them his good side, and then hired the leader of the violent unlawful anarchsist protester group to run his campaign, then upon winning inserted that same leader to various important institutional positions.
But that just ain’t it.
The alt-right could be literally just made up of just 10 people, and the right would still have to answer for them because two of those people are the President of the United States and one of his most trusted advisors, who has (probably illegally) been placed on the national security council. Like it or not, this is an incredibly powerful fraction of the party, and it’s on the right to rein them in, or accept being represented by them.
There is as much point to “debating” that shitstained troll as there is to “debating” this shitstained troll, and the sooner he crosses the line and gets banned, the fucking better. Until then, I gently recommend the “ignore” button.
“Interesting point of view”?
You mean like that campuses were better off without women on them?
Or that we should drop the “T” when talking about LGBT rights?
Or that he “chose” to be gay?
Or that he wishes he could choose not to be gay?
Perhaps next we can do a live panel at a university with someone reading lines from a thread on 4Chan /b/.
Not a hard issue to understand. You could be a Homeless Transgender Black Muslim Lesbian with jewish heritage, and if you say shit like, “Is being homosexual “wrong”? Something somewhere inside of me says Yes,” you’re still a bigot! Although this would explain you quite a bit - you do realize that the fact that you’re black doesn’t actually mean that any given thing you say is automatically unbigoted, right?
It was relevant to the particular exchange I was having with another poster.
Based on his hopes for skulls to be crushed, Blinky’s a big fan of hurting others.
You don’t have to agree with me.
That is my own ranking.
You are welcome to make your own ranking and put whoever you want on your list.
I also believe that he is mocking all of the right groups and people that should be mocked, as they are the ones who are terrible people.
No, it is more correct to say that I am a big fan of self defense.
It is groups like the antifa thugs and the black clad cowards that are the violent animals.