Or, he tells truths that left-wing extremists don’t want to hear and then makes fun of them when they wig out, which is always good value for money 
Yeah, that’s probably it. Everyone knows that Breitbart prides themselves on their intellectual honesty.
He’s white, he’s male and he’s successful. There’s 3 reasons to be right of center. He’s gay. There’s a reason to be left of center. 3-1, it’s not hard to figure out.
Milo is also a “poet”. Chris Kluwe did a live tweet with photos from one of Milo’s book of collected works:
Yiannopoulos may be wrong 90% of the time, but those rare times SJWs cry when he’s right make it all worthwhile.
Like doing hit pieces on anyone he decides he doesn’t like? I suppose that is one method to get ‘under someone’s skin’, but then again so is using a filleting knife.
What truths exactly does milo share with SJWs?
For example, the fact that the tired canard about women earning 78 cents for every dollar a man makes is misleading and disingenuous.
AAAAAAnnnndddd - there’s the anti-feminism that I said Milo & Breitbart are promoting.
Sorry, but it’s true.
Oh, yeah, that ‘old canard’ that happens to be true!
Its just like that old canard about not stepping on rusty nails! SJWs just hate that one!!
Sorry yourself, dude. But if the wage gap is a myth then it wasn’t shown to be that way by anything Milo ever wrote. You’re talking about a guy who uses Encylopedia Dramatica as a source.
Your own link debunks you.
“That’s the trouble with just using the 78 cents statistic: it doesn’t take into account job choice, education, experience, tenure or hours worked.”
The article then goes on to compare different professions but again, doesn’t control for hours worked, maternity, holidays, different choices in benefits etc…
Here’s a better article: The ‘Wage Gap’ Myth That Just Won’t Die.
Also, if it were true that a business owner could get away with paying women less than men for the same work, why would any business owner ever hire a man? He’d effectively be imposing a 22% tax on himself in exchange for absolutely no tangible benefit whatsoever.
Who cares? So someone else wrote it. What difference does that make?
For articles on the wage gap? Cite please.
If you only read the parts you want to hear, sure it does. Not a surprisising action from a Milo fan.
THe worst you can say about ‘78 cents’ is that it is superficial, but drill down and the situation gets even worse. If you think that is you winning, welll, have another drink Mr. Sheen.
The fact that all of those things negatively impact a woman’s earning power are examples of sexism in the work force. When men take their fair share of time off for childcare and suffer the same impacts from trying to juggle work and family, the wage gap would decrease.
The wage gap is not primarily about sexists deciding that women are worth less - although it would foolish to insist that sexism never exists. The wage gap reflects the way that men dump the burden of daily life onto womens’ shoulders and also how society rewards the men for doing so.
That’s one of the big reasons that so many “family values” assholes and just sexist assholes, like Milo, are against extended family care for men and women both. They want to reinforce society norms that let them shift the burden of family life to the women.
Anyone remember that black woman who really seriously wanted to be an officer within the KKK?
Circa 1998 or thereabouts.
ETA: found it
Nope. Drill down and the situation gets better. If you control for hours worked, choice of major, choice of career, amount of holiday taken, maternity leave, propensity for dangerous (and, therefore, higher paying) work and about a million other things the wage gap almost disappears.
Also, as I said before, if it were true that a business owner could get away with paying women less than men for the same work, why would any business owner ever hire a man? He’d effectively be imposing a 22% tax on himself in exchange for absolutely no tangible benefit whatsoever.
[quote=“Tithonus, post:34, topic:760298”]
Who cares? So someone else wrote it. What difference does that make?
/?QUOTE]
Because you seem to be singing the praises with a psychopath discguised as a reporter and you love him because he sometimes annoys a group you are not fond of.
This is like praising a crazy guy in your neighborhood who shits on everyone’s lawns but you sing his praises because he sometimes shits on the lawn of that neighbor you don’t like (who is also upwind).
No, not over the wage gap. It was his extended attack pieces on someone he decided he didn’t like.
And when things even out they still find a gap. My link showed as much.
But this is not GD. Go start a thread there if you want. This is about what an utter psychopathic shitheel Milo is.