Oh, yes. You’ll recall that there was plenty of attention at the time to the fact that Trump had taken the American translator’s notes away from her.
No doubt the topic was on the list as soon as Biden took office. But if they didn’t do anything about it then, February 24 of this year must have seemed like an opportune time to revisit the question of what Putin had said to Donald.
Trump insisted he told Woodward “these tapes are for the written word, these tapes are for your [previous] book, these are not to be sold, these are tapes for your book, to help you. I like that because it’s more accurate,” he added.
“So now he’s making an audiobook out of it, so we’ll sue him,” Trump said.
I assume he has that in writing? Or on ‘tape’?
That’s a novel claim. I’m sure it’s been the industry standard ever since audiobooks became a thing.
My prediction is that for the 5,000th time, Trump is making shit up and has absolutely nothing to back up his claims. His parroting propaganda chimps (Hannity, Carlson, any number of radio trolls) will froth at the mouth about the injustice. If it ever gets to court, it will get tossed out as the judge excoriates the plaintiffs for the frivolous and abusive lawsuit. Lawyers get sanctioned. Trump continues bleating about Deep State witch hunts.
Sun again sets and rises…
He’s claimed the National Archives’ documents and various classified one are his. Snatching ad Woodward’s is a doddle.
I need dressing with that word salad.
Who is the, “We…” doing the suing? The royal, WE!??
And what fine group of lawyers (plural) will be hired for this, stroke of genius, action?
Will they get paid?
So many questions.
To be answered… in two weeks.
Lawsuit coming IN TWO WEEKS!
Trump may have a bit of a point, in that if the primary selling point of the audio book is to hear Trump talking then perhaps Trump deserves some portion of the profits. But that will have to be fought out by copyright lawyers and I doubt that it will allow Trump to completely suppress it.
Along with the plan for Trump Healthcare?
Quite simple, really. The magical wall was thrown up while he was president, then just as magically disappeared when the evil-wizard Democrats stole the election.
After he said “who knew it could be so hard?” was anything ever again said about it? Was it just given up on? Of course, it came to nothing.
Woodward just released twenty Individual 1 interview tapes for free.
We can all check “prison rape” off of our Trump BINGO cards:
So … that happened.
He associates being married with a traumatic experience done against one’s will? Makes sense for Trump given his record. I’d feel the same way if I were married to Don.
So he thinks of rape as a disciplinary tool. Nice.
The prison rape thing is abhorrent, but I’m wondering how a SCOTUS leak rises to the level of “national security”. Plus, I’m in the school the leaker was someone on the conservative side locking in the support and preventing it getting watered down by Roberts, so for a right-wing woman hater the leak was a good thing.
Sigh. Reason, logic, common sense do not apply here.
It doesn’t but that’s not the point. The point is that you say its national security, that way you can imprison whomever you want without worrying about pesky civil rights. Who stole my strawberries? It’s national security. It’s pure authoritarianism.