If he were deceased, he definitely would not have pissed me off.
Oh, I don’t know. Somehow I think he would still have managed.
Not surprisingly, even while he was President, Individual 1 owed millions of dollars to a company with North Korea connections.
I bet that’s the tip of the iceberg for the illegal shit that his financial records will show. Though this may not technically be illegal.
Trump may have skirted disclosure laws and not committed an outright violation because the loan was on the books of his company, the Trump Organization, and not identified as a personal loan, Forbes noted.
That’s what organized crime bosses do you know, try to keep their own hands looking as clean as possible.
Such loans are largely reported on an honor system because the U.S. Office of Government Ethics has neither the resources nor the power to delve into a president’s assets.
Relying on Trump in an “honor system”.
Well, he did gift us with Don Jr, Eric, Ivanka & Barron. That’ll be a good reason to hate him for years!
As usual, poor Tiffany is a forgotten afterthought
OMG, lol. I did totally forget her.
Watch, she’ll end up being the Worst!
He caused me to have a weird dream about Don Jr. Eating blue ice cream.
Individual 1 has refused to give a DNA sample in the E. Jean Carroll rape case.
His DNA is under audit.
Can’t perform???
It would reveal his reptilian core.
There is speculation that Mary Trump might be willing to give DNA to the cause. It wouldn’t prove conclusively that it was Trump but it would narrow it down to blood relatives with at most 2 degrees of separation from Mary, and unless E Jean Carrol had an encounter with another Trump it would be quite the coincidence that it would be anyone but him.
They’ll just get a warrant. Law enforcement do this all the time with people who refuse to comply.
You know what they say: “We can do this the easy way, or…”
Can’t they just go through his trash? There are bound to be some old ketchup bottles he licked the tops of.
Interesting idea, but it would give too much credibility to circumstantial evidence.
DNA evidence from a close relative is not “circumstantial”
Not only that, but circumstantial evidence carries the same weight as direct evidence in a court of law.
The notion that circumstantial evidence is “lesser” evidence is one out of Hollywood.
Nor would they use DNA from a relative when the person from whom they seek DNA evidence is available. Or can be made to be available.
Heh.
Trying to visualize how this would play out.