That’s awesome. I want one.
Obviously it’s a conventional analog movement just with jokey numbers at the 12 points of the hours. So the watch is presently set to just shy of 10:10, despite the hour hand being partway between the points labeled “3” & “8”.
Then I began to think of how you could make such a watch really work in accordance with its number markings. Easy enough as a computer graphic, not so easy as a collection of gears. We’re already used to the idea that the minute hand’s meaning ignores the numbers 1 through 12 arranged conventionally on a conventional clock. So we’re only trying to decide how to display the hours.
I decided we’d ignore the twelfth-of-a-circle segments AKA “intervals” where the number change moving clockwise is negative. So the hour hand will never appear in the 9-6, 6-1, 10-5, 11-7, or 7-2 intervals. Meanwhile an hour hand will appear in each relevant interval at the appropriate analog angle.
So at the times between noon/midnight and 4 o’clock an hour hand will be in the first 1/12th of the face with 2 o’clock sharp being halfway between the “12” & the “4”. And between 2 o’clock & 3 o’clock another hour hand will appear between the “2” & “3”, with 2:30 being the midpoint of that hour hand’s movement.
Once it gets to be 4 o’clock things change again. The first hour hand slows down, now taking 5 hours to get from the “4” to the “9” whereas it took only 4 hours moving through the same angle to get from the “12” to the “4”. During the 4 o’clock to 9 o’clock interval another hour hand will appear 20% of the interval past the “3” and move towards the “8”. To be joined by a third hour hand at 5 o’clock that appears at the “5” and move towards the “11”, taking 6 hours to get there. etc.
You actually only need the upper third of the watch to display the hour: 0-9 in the first two twelfths of the circle and 3-12 in the last two twelfths. With the hours from 3 to 9 displayed with a hand on both sides. But it’s more fun to also include the additional redundant hour hands in the 1-10, 5-11, and 2-3 ranges when appropriate. Most of the time it’s 3 or 4 hour hands. Between 11 o’clock and 1 o’clock there’s just one hour hand. Booorrriiiing!! 
Of course this wacky idea could be generalized to have minute hands behave similarly under the usual convention that the hour number is counting minutes by 5s. As in the “3” on a conventional clock face means 3 hours or 3 * 5 = 15 minutes. So between the hour and 4 *5 = 20 minutes after the hour there’s a minute hand in the first interval.
As a matter of cognitive psychology & human factors mind-f***ery I’m not sure whether having the minute hand be consistent with normal convention or having it be consistent with the wacky hour hand(s) would be more confusing. Thoughts?
Seconds could be done the same as minutes of course. So for a clock with second hands you’d have as few as 3 hands of various sorts displayed or as many as 12 at any given moment. With second hands blinking in and out of existence every few seconds at different points around the circle and moving at different angular speeds.
Probably not worth sharpening my rusty coding skills to develop it, but it would make a fun screensaver or widget or something.
