I don’t know or care if California does; I move over. I know that Minnesota and Wisconsin, where I’ve done most of my driving for the past 20 years, have them, which is where I learned about it.
My state has one. I think there are signs. The governor was even ticketed for violating it a few years before his election. Once he was governor, he turned it into a public spectacle by making a rude comment about the police officer.
I was not aware there were such laws, but common sense, safety and courtesy suggests that you should take reasonable measures to avoid hitting a police vehicle. I certainly do.
Mousing over that map, it looks like most laws were implemented since 2001. That suggests to me that there was a concerted, organized, nationwide movement to pass such, not just legislation passed at random times or when some state rep thought of it.
Penalties are steep too. $275.00 fine and 3 points on your driver’s license for first time offenders, higher fine for repeat offenders. When this law was originally proposed a few years ago legislators considered jail time as well.
In Wisconsin as well:
I suppose I didn’t know it was a ‘law’, but just about every (marked) police/sheriff/trooper vehicle has a “Move over or slow down” bumper sticker on it. Actually, even a lot of municipal vehicles have them as well. 'Round here, you’d have to be pretty oblivious to not be aware that you’re supposed to be doing that.
What bugs me is the people that seem to think it’s ‘move over and slow down’. If we’re on a two lane 40mph highway going about 45mph and you see someone pulled over, you don’t have to move into the left lane and slow down to 33mph. You’re trying not to clip the officer, you don’t need to worry that he’s going to jump out in front of you. But sometimes I think that’s just the “Cop! gotta slow down so I don’t get a ticket, regardless of how fast I’m currently going” mentality.
That’s an astonishing video they show at the start of that. :eek:
I can’t believe he manages to immediately get up.
When I first heard about this law, it didn’t make sense to me, in that why is it for police officers specifically? What if regular joe’s car has broken down?
But I guess in traffic stops there’s a lot more going on; the parties involved can’t give full attention to the road. They may get in and out of their cars repeatedly. And, crucially, the cop probably needs to get out on the traffic side to get a decent view into the car he’s pulled over. So, on reflection, it has my support.
Ya know, I can understand rubber necking, but it’s pointless when the person is just getting a ticket. A car accident, sure, glance over and take a look. Everyone is curious, but don’t slow down, just keep moving. I’ve always wished there was some way to ticket people for doing that. It drives me nuts when I’m caught in a traffic jam for a few minutes only to find out that someone was getting a speeding ticket and the traffic breaks as soon as we pass the squad with it’s lights on.
Even funnier is when I’m driving and the person in front of me slams on his breaks and slows way down for no apparent reason. Then a quarter mile later we pass a cop with someone pulled over, on the other side of the road and I figure the person in front of me must have a radar detector that must have been going off.
btw I was specifically thinking about dangerous situations like passing a broken down car on the freeway/motorway. Obviously a blanket “move over if any car is parked, ever” law wouldn’t work too well.
I think New Yorkers are probably better informed on this than average because the law was amended recently and there’s been a public service ad campaign informing people of the current law.
We’ve had a move-over law for several years, but I was taught from the beginning to move over (when safe to do so) for any vehicle on the side of the road. It’s the courteous thing to do, buys you extra space and time to deal with the unexpected, and telegraphs to the other vehicle that you have noticed them.
Indiana has had a “Move Over/Slow Down” law for most of the years I’ve been driving, instituted shortly after a few trooper fatalities. Signs, both roadside and electronic, advertise it throughout the state. Here it’s applicable both to emergency vehicles and law enforcement (red, red/white, red/blue lights), and stationary service vehicles with flashing yellow lights.
I was surprised when I learned recently that there was a law for this; I guess I assumed that everyone already knew you were supposed to do it. It was definitely emphasized in my high school drivers ed class (in the late 1980s) in NY state, and it was one of the things my parents would mention a lot when I was a young driver.
I’m going to respond without checking, because I think I know what my state’s law is.
When approaching an emergency vehicle with lights activated and stopped on the side of the road, drivers must either move to a further lane (if in the adjacent lane and on a multi-lane road) or (if changing lanes is not possible) slow to a reasonable speed, proceeding cautiously. If approaching such a vehicle on a road with a single lane in each direction, the driver must slow down and proceed with the utmost caution.
Now Ima check your link.
Yup. Pretty much nailed it. I have a CDL, so I have to have a good grasp of traffic laws in my state. I just wish others had a similar grasp.
I only learned of this very recently, from a friend who’s a truckie. He talked his way out of a ticket for it, by explaining that he couldn’t move over, as someone was in the next lane already.
Heck, I’m amazed at how many people don’t know to move out of the way of an approaching emergency vehicle – the other kind of “move over” law. It sometimes seems like an age test: the older drivers all pull over to the curb to let a fire truck go past, and the younger drivers just…don’t.