OK, so I won’t die if I don’t know this by midnight, but it would help…
How many people does it take to be able to legitimately call a sexual situation an orgy?
I say definitely more than three or four, likely five or more.
Five or more was my (unaccepted) answer.
I also insisted that a “gang bang” had to consist of one girl and three or more guys (or vice-versa should some man ever find himself in that situation).
Any time you’re unsure of whose arm/leg/breast/fingers/genitals you’re grinding against, that’s an orgy.
Defining a gang bang has more to do, IMO, with how you’re doing what you’re doing than how many people you’re doing it with. I could definitely see an orgy taking place between a girl and three or more guys, to use the definition in the OP.
Two girls and a guy: Menage a tois
Two guys (or more) and one girl: gangbang
Two of each, or three girls and a guy: foursome
Five or more total, including at least two girls: orgy
An orgy requires a minimum of more than one person of each gender - meaning at least 2 guys and 2 girls, so a minimum of four. There must be at least four so nobody feels left out if two of the people pair up for a while. An event with one girl but multiple guys is a “gang bang”, unless there are only 2 guys, then it’s just a threesome.
Unless of course it’s Tuesday, and then you’ve got a Royal Fizzbin.
If reference to disctionaries told us everything about the connotations of words, it would be a boring language indeed. Fortunately, they don’t and it isn’t.
I’d say ski got it right – an orgy generally requires at least five including more than one person of each sex. If numbers increase, the ratio of men to women has to hover somewhere near equality. I don’t feel myself qualified to say exactly where the line is, but the point is that balance is important.