This is the new conservative tactic - to question and cast doubt on the way law enforcement works and the way we view crime in our society.
Like the party line that the FBI was biased because they investigated tips that came from a partisan source. But that’s the way law enforcement works. Information often comes from people that don’t like the perp. Gangbangers squeak on members of rival gangs. Disgruntled ex-wives spill the beans on their husbands. And cops often develop a bias against the criminals while they are investigating, because the evidence that is being uncovered puts them in an unsympathetic light.
Plus the insistence that certain crimes, like failing to register as a foreign agent, obstruction of justice and fraud aren’t really crimes. Or really minor crimes that are being blown out of proportion. But they’re not.
But this is new low, suggesting that the fault lies with the victim for not being vigilant enough. It’s like blaming a burglary on the homeowner for having a cheap alarm system. So I guess The DNC servers were some sort of “attractive nuisance” — and the collaborators were like 4 year old kids who live next door to a house with a pool. Because everyone says that anyone would have hacked those servers, just like anyone would’ve taken that meeting at Trump Tower.