Seeing as how the entire Arab world loathes George Bush, as seen by them burning effigies of him on the streets, comparing him to Hitler etc…
Wouldn’t voting him out of the office sort of prove that that democracy works? If they see a leader they hate deposed of by peaceful means, it would register with them on some level that democracy is better then the monarchies or theocracies they have now. It would make Saudis and Iranians wish they had some method of deposing leaders they dislike. So therefore, W taking a dive during election time would actually do far more to advance his agenda of bringing democracy to the middle east than invading them would.
Maybe that was George’s crafty plan all along, become hated and then get voted out. What do you think?
Well, yeah, but that’s a dicto simpliciter. I mean, it proves that democracy works either way — whether he’s voted in or out. Did you mean to ask whether voting him out of office would prove that they have substantial influence over our democracy?
The Saudis and Iranians already wish they had some method of deposing leaders they dislike. They don’t need us to show them that democracy is better than monarchies or theocracies.
If you stop thinking of Arabs as ignorant savages mindlessly going about their business with no thought of making their voices heard in their own government, you’ll go a lot further in understanding what’s actually going on over there.
I tell you all once again that the introduction of democracy to the Middle East has about as much to do with our nations involvement with that region as the conversion of the heathens to Roman Catholicism had to do with the Spanish Conquest. It was a convenient cover story but the underlying motive in the case of Cortez, Pizarro, Desoto, Coronado and the boys was not to add soles to the Holy Fathers jurisdiction, it was gold and silver which the Incas and Aztecs had plenty of and plenty of it went to Spain. Now what is it the Middle East has that the West and especially the US might be able to use? Shall we think about this for a few moments before we venture a guess?
I thought fresco means painting on wet plaster so that the pigments become embedded inside the plaster itself. Fresco is literally “fresh”. And that painting on dry plaster produced works that wouldn’t last nearly as long because they could flake off.
You start with Cyprus, the U.S. pays for moving all the Greek Cypriots to Greece, and all the Turkish Cypriots to Turkey. That leaves an uninhabited island. You move the Palestinians there, that gives them their own country. Then you move the Kurds to the places vacated by the Palestinians, and give them their own country. Then you move…
All you need is a big budget. And lots of moving vans.
To follow up on Dex’spost, I would suggest airlifting the Jews out of Israel into let’s say Nevada so that they could still have their own state would solve the entire Middle East problem, and be a lot cheaper.
