That reminds me, I’ve been craving huevos rancheros for over a week now. I need to get to a Mexican restaurant that serves breakfast all day.
Two big hairy guys with a big dead fish? Ah, no, I like the guys with titties that smell good. Able to type in the midst of hot monkey love? A major bonus!
Perhaps a bonus to you, but less than complimentary to the co-conspirator, wouldn’t you say? 
On the internets, nobody knows you type rhythmically…
This thread is now about breakdancing. Robot like a mofo.
But all that really matters is, do you like your haircut?
Lol. Thanks, I guess.
At worst, it was an inadvertent omission. Check out post #233 in that thread, which I made before I was accused of misquoting anyone. I said this:
If I had been trying to dishonestly pretend that What Exit had not used his qualifier, I would not have argued that the cite in question supported my position.
Perhaps one could debate over whether the cite in question supported my position, but clearly I was arguing against the best reasonable interpretation of What Exit’s claim.
Thank you for starting this thread brazil84. I really needed a good laugh today.
What Exit? used the term “misquoted” in good faith, istm. His terminology was probably more efficient than saying
Anyway, even if it was inaccurate enough to make the word “misquoted” invalid, the fact that it was in good faith means that the exchange is not a valid example of What Exit? posting a lie (as is claimed in the OP.
* 
ETA: And brazil84, even if you the other bit about the house does support your position (I’m not taking a position on that), it doesn’t mean that you didn’t lie by broadening his actual assertion.
I think some light has dawned on this. This thread only makes sense IF brazil84 is…
Governor Rod Blagojevich!
Now I get it. The same stalwart steadfastness. The same one note argument. The same blind arrogance that flashes quickly and then falls in embers into the cyber void…
Not true.
He can be described as:
-
A less than intelligent sufferer of actualized Oedipal urges.
-
A goat felching tulip.
-
A road-kill licking waste of genetic material.
Or various other unpleasant or undesirable things.
Upon reviewing the thread, I think you are right. What he really meant to say is that I had not stated his position correctly.
Especially given my statement in post 233, he should not have assumed that I did so intentionally, since I argued against his stated position as opposed to some invented strawman. But there it is.
Having reviewed the thread, I think you are right to an extent. However, at this point he knows that I did not misquote him and the honest thing to do would have been to admit it.
like the visual organ of the graceful Odocoileus virginianus, male of course
Just HAD to go there, d’in’t ya?
Given how you titled this thread, I’m afraid I’m not eager to extend to you the benefit of the doubt.
Daniel
I have read the original thread and this one carefully and have discovered three things:
- it was perfectly clear what What Exit meant
- brazil84 is an obsessive fool
- I wasted 10 minutes on this absurdity
To paraphrase: I dinna think that word (a.k.a. ‘liar’) means what (the OP) thinks it means…
-XT
I think we are now seeing the violence inherent in the system…
This is absolutely amazing! I, too, have a loaf of banana bread on my desk!
Two big hairy guys with a big dead fish? Ah, no, I like the guys with titties that smell good. Able to type in the midst of hot monkey love? A major bonus!
You already said that, dude! Is tabbed browsing not your friend today?