Here’s the transcript of the Hume interview with Cheney on Fox
Here’s Cheney’s description of what happened after the accident:
Quote:
Hume: So did you run over to him or —
Cheney: Ran over to him and —
Hume: And what did you see? He’s lying there —
Cheney: He was laying there on his back, obviously bleeding. You could see where the shot had struck him. And one of the fortunate things was that I’ve always got a medical team, in effect, covering me wherever I go. I had a physician’s assistant with me that day. Within a minute or two he was on the scene administering first-aid. And –
Hume: And Mr. Whittington was conscious, unconscious, what?
Cheney: He was conscious —
Hume: What did you say?
Cheney: Well, I said, “Harry, I had no idea you were there.” And —
Hume: What did he say?
Cheney: He didn’t respond. He was — he was breathing, conscious at that point, but he didn’t — he was, I’m sure, stunned, obviously, still trying to figure out what had happened to him. The doc was fantastic - endQuote
One little thing bothers me, though. According to this Fox news reportdays earlier, eyewitness Katharine Armstrong paints a more caring portrait of Cheney after the accident:
“Armstrong said Cheney was very apologetic after the shot, held Whittington’s face and cleaned up the blood.”
Cheney doesn’t bring this up at all in the Fox interview. Why wouldn’t he? Even if he was leary to bring up personal issues, why wouldn’t he say, “I held Harry’s head, and told him how sorry I was” That would go a long way toward sympathy in this public announcement.
Cheney’s defense of how the press handling of this event by Armstrong hinges on her reliability as an eyewitness.
Was she embellishing here? Something doesn’t click right for me.