The sad thing is that I did know the reference, I just didnt’ clue in.
:smack:
Will someone cover for me, please?

The sad thing is that I did know the reference, I just didnt’ clue in.
:smack:
Will someone cover for me, please?

I touched on this subject in aprevious post in this thread. Dammit, we need a tongue-in-cheek smilie, but I guess maybe the rolleyes :rolleyes: would do.
The “secure, undisclosed location” he keeps running off to could be Room 239 at the Austin Airport Holiday Inn, for all we know.
Add one part eleanorigby and perhaps another part Fear Itself.
Even if one couldn’t figure out what they could possibly be covering up, it seems they’ve gone to an unusual amount of trouble to do so, doesn’t it?
There are two obvious coverup candidates:
As mentioned, they could have been covering up possible drinking on Cheney’s part, or that he was hunting while under the influence of bad interactions between an otherwise perfectly reasonable beer or two, and otherwise perfectly reasonable prescription meds. Unless someone can get new witnesses to testify (and there are several available - Ambassador Pamela Williford (the third shooter in the party), the guide (Cheney said there was one), the Secret Service, and maybe even the hired help who prepared and cleaned up after the lunch, if they existed), we’ll never know about this.
The other one, which I haven’t seen mentioned, is that they hoped to cover up the seriousness of the injuries to Whittington, with the thought that that would have made it more likely for the public to just laugh the whole thing off. And that attempted coverup is hiding in plain sight - they did their level best to send Katharine Armstrong out there to make light of his injuries - and if not for the heart attack, they might’ve succeeded on that score.
At any rate, for your linking pleasure, here’s a detailed comparison of Katharine Armstrong’s assorted stories with each other. She doesn’t agree with herself, let alone with Cheney. It’s an alternation of links, quotes, and commentary, just like a good Doper post, so it’s best if you just go there and read it yourself.
You forgot the U.S. Border Patrol agent.
No, really. Post #408. WTF was a Border Patrol agent doing there??
I mean, even if nothing was being covered up, it’s like trying to unravel all the conflicting tales from Murder on theOrient Express.
The police report, or at least as much as they’ve released to the public.
Just to make my earlier point clear: I don’t see any conspiracy. Along the lines of eleanorigby, what I see are Cheney, the Armstrongs, etc. assuming the prerogatives of landed gentry, and the Secret Service and the local constabulary buying into it and treating them with inappropriate deference.
“You forgot the U.S. Border Patrol agent.”
Heh, actually I didn’t. He simply struck me as a non-entity, having made no statement on the event.
I read your link too and everything seemed easily explainable. Armstrong certainly took part in the group assisting Whittington and heard the discussions going on there about what had happened between witnesses, including whether he announced, etc. She also is simply over zealous in wanting to protect the VP but that does not necessitate her having been coached by Rove or anyone else.
It’s funny, two people can read the exact same story and come away with completely different perceptions on what happened. When I read the story from Salinas you posted above, my first impression was “Well there, that ought to put an end to any speculation.” But instead the comments have rung of “See! Even a whole bunch of law enforcement and ranch workers are involved. This conspiracy must be even bigger than we thought!”
I don’t blame anyone for harboring the exact same sentiment as kaylasdad99. Maybe we’re just getting there in two different ways.
What’s the old adage… something about how if there’s a simple and a complex solution to any problem, more than likely the simple one will be correct. With that in mind, you’ve either got an extremely well-orchestrated contingent of disparate individuals and agencies all brought together in remarkably short time with a common goal of perpetuating a lie to protect a not too popular individual, OR… it was just an accident.
I see Whittington told the deputy that there was no alcohol on the hunt, contrary to what Cheney said yesterday, and what Armstrong said on Tuesday or Wednesday.
The unidentified Border Patrol agent is mentioned on page 4 of the police report. It was this agent, rather than the Secret Service, who turned away Captain Kirk (don’t’cha just love saying that?) of the Sheriff’s office at the Armstrong Ranch gate on Saturday evening. So I retract what I said about the Secret Service just now: it had been reported earlier that it was Secret Service who turned Kirk away, but apparently not.
Understood. I might buy into a diluted bit of that myself.
Well, dayum, lieu, that’s no fair. If you just go and at least semi-agree with me, I’ve got to toss away a bunch of now-meaningless words.
Similarly, I’m satisfied with exactly what you say here - “simply over zealous in wanting to protect the VP.”
But even though we pretty much have a meeting of the minds, I’m going to at least review some of the bidding, since I’ve marshalled the facts.
From Sunday until midday Tuesday (when news of Whittington’s heart attack came over the wires), everyone from Katharine Armstrong to Jeb Bush was making light of Whittington’s injuries - and that Armstrong, Cheney, Whittington, Williford, and especially the doctor, I’m sure, knew all along that those injuries were much more serious.
Armstrong and Whittington both initially said that there was no alcohol involved in the day’s activities.
That’s the gist of it, really. A minor cover-up of something that was more of a serious embarrassment than a crime, but people cover up embarrassing stuff all the time.
There’s still the willingness of the local sheriff to take ‘no’ for an answer on Saturday evening, which, like I said, I put down to inappropriate deference to the local landed (50,000 acres qualifies as ‘landed’, even in Texas) gentry, rather than to any conspiratorial motives.
I have no idea about the border patrol guy. Was he stalling on behalf of the Armstrongs? Did he just not know anything of note had happened? Damned if I know. I’m thinking that if I were a reporter on the story, I’d want to find his name, track him down, and ask him. Starting with, “does the Armstrong Ranch normally host Border Patrol agents?” But really, no evidence that this guy was part of a conspiracy, even if he inadvertently played a key role. Chances are it just happened. It’s still a loose end, but chances are nothing important’s down that road.
Similarly with the former sheriff now working for the Armstrongs. Presumably at the time the sheriff called him, the Armstrongs hadn’t had time to think about him in terms of what he might tell the police; it was pretty early yet. So whether he was making light of the incident out of loyalty to the Armstrongs, or whether, as far as he knew, it really was no big deal, who knows? It happened. No evidence of conspiracy.
So that’s my non-conspiracy. A handful of rich, influential people, going to a fair amount of trouble to (mostly unsuccessfully) minimize the impact of an embarrassing incident on one of their number.
So have you heard about the new gun safety program being developed? Its motto is going to be “When it comes to Gun Safety, Don’t be a Dick”
And they may have rolled the dice with Harry Whittington’s life and health to do so.
From the Corpus Christi Caller-Times (registration required):
So between dithering about where to take Whittington, and the detour to the smaller local hospital, it wasn’t until about 2 hours and 50 minutes after being shot that they got Whittington to the doors of a hospital with a trauma unit.
Correct this doc if he’s wrong, but:
I’ve heard before about trauma center care being the key variable, so I suspect it’s true. And if true, it’s hard to argue that the docs and Secret Service accompanying Cheney wouldn’t know this too.
So it looks like the same non-conspiracy, but with the stakes a wee tad higher. Risking a man’s life to reduce vice-presidential embarrassment is a big deal.
I have no conspiracy theory, but there is alot that is odd about this whole thing. Why the local paper? Why Armstrong? Why the podunk (and I work at one, so I can say that) hospital? Someone lacks common sense and critical thinking skills,but I’ll leave it there.
Well that was pretty much my point. Cheney shoots a guy and it is a bad day for him.
From CNN:
Man, this guy is such an asshole for shooting the vice president!
“I’m sorry you shot me in my fucking face”
:rolleyes: x 1,000,000
I’ll bet they promised him the next Supreme Court seat.
I was wondering that myself. I bet there are a lot of 0’s on his check.
I smell a Medal of Freedom for someone…