Here’s an honest question, doorhinge. What do you get out of trolling? A lot of our trolls are adolescents or at least pretty young. You seem to be older than that. Is your life rally so empty that you get entertainment by demonstrating your stupidity and ignorance over and over again? Why do you deliberately seek out ridicule?
I don’t really expect anything but more trolling in response to this, but thought I would at least ask.
No, that’s not his point at all. It’s important you figure this out for yourself, however, so other than suggesting you look up the term ‘analogy’, I’m not going to give you any further hints.
Meanwhile, do you agree that saying there are nearly 200 countries in the world is a reasonably accurate statement?
Is this your first honest question regarding this, or the other thread? I find your posts in both to be trolling, at best. Combined with several other posters, there’s enough strawmen, red herrings, innuendo, ATTEMPTED bullying, and aggravated mopery to make your daily diary entries a full time job. Dear diary, why won’t people stop posting when I tell them to? Why won’t people accept my incredibly stupid bets? Why do people ridicule the Colibri? Don’t they know who I am?
I would like to think that I could help you understand what you simply refuse to understand, but perhaps your twitter and facebook friends could provide advice that you’d actually listen to. Maybe not?
You spoke in the context of climate change, and said you think global warming is happening.
Which you didn’t mean as you accept the consensus of the vast majority of experts that the Earth is warming more than it would due to human activity, but instead meant, “The last ice age was cold, and it’s warmer now, hyuk.”
You’re a liar. And, as reported before, you’ll die alone, and be eaten by your mom’s cats.
Yes, there are nearly 200 countries in the world. Have you seen the actual signed document? Did representatives of nearly 200 countries actually sign it?
Just how binding is this LATEST COP agreement? Are 1st world countries now automatically required to raise taxes to do battle with naturally occurring CO2? Will 2nd world countries be allowed to ignore this “binding” agreement? Will 3rd world countries ever actually receive the hundreds of million dollars that they’ve been promised? So many questions, so many successful COP announcements.
Hahahaha. That’s why you have such a difficult time convincing more fence-sitters, skeptics, and deniers to accept your version of global warming/climate change. You chose to ignore what they actually say and chose to substitute your own babbling strawman. How’s that workin’ out for ya?
Well, it is not my problem that you are a being with no sense of humor and can not identify a joke even with a smilie on it.
So it is working fine for me, first by showing all that you are still incapable of knowing where Greenland is (Almost all In the Arctic as we always said, you only stupidly tried to claim that we had claimed that Greenland was the Arctic. and that was a lie from you.)
And second: To show all that you have no sense of humor.
Why are you asking me these questions? I have nothing to do with any climate conferences. I just thought it rather odd that you seemed to have no idea how many countries were involved. If what you want to talk about now is the results of the conference, or, I don’t know, how CNN is supposedly misrepresenting the results, you should start a thread for that.
In all the vast omniverse that is the Boards, there is nothing nearly so lame as posting a dictionary definition as though it made a point. It is the neutron density of lame, any further collapse and it becomes a blocked hole, with a non-event horizon.
And yet it works so well. Especially during written communication. You may prefer to make up your own definitions when you think it’s necessary to obscure your point.