Seems like they cut out a lot of info to cram it into that short running time. Do you have a link to the Director’s cut?
Eight six seven, five three oh ni-YEE-ine!
Liberty Liberty Lib-er-ty! Lib-er-ty!
HUDSON THREE TWO SEVEN HUNDRED!
Fucker blames a bridge collapse on lazy, unskilled workers. Dumb fuck. Some construction jobs require certification, but even for those that don’t any mistakes they make should be caught by competent construction oversight.
Who is going to do this oversight? Can’t be the government, because that’s socialism!
You’re joking, but a communiqé yesterday from one of the Republican Congressmen opposed to the investigation of criminals referred to the Democratic Congressmen as “Socialists” — sorry, I didn’t save a Bookmark. He wasn’t talking about M4A or Green New Deal; he was talking about the investigation of criminal extortion and illegal collusion. “Socialist.” :smack:
On a happier(?) note, I realize I violated my own rule about condoning mention of HD in *this* thread. I've purged my Ignore list down to just **HD** and **Annoying**.Gonna address something further back: putting HD on ignore is a great idea, but if you are interested in the threads he inhabits and hijacks, it doesn’t really do you any good. He still winds up stopping the legitimate discussion with his tactics.
That is, after all, the point of sea lioning–to stop the legitimate discussion.
What do you mean by “legitimate”?
What if EVERY ONE of us puts HD on Ignore? And if sealion abettors like Annoying quote HD in defiance, then we all put those abettors on Ignore?
In that case HD, Annoying and other oafs could have their own conversation in a thread, but their whingeing and nonsense would be invisible to the rest of us.
He is currently trying to hijack the transgender hate speech thread with a “Republicans are mistreated too!!” post.
Why are you answering him in that thread then?
That’s not unheard of. I’m pretty much in the same boat.
But not so I can keep up with the play-by-play of what he’s been up to. I just like seeing people saying horrible things about him. 
- I was pointing out to others why it was a hijack attempt.
- The “Everyone should ignore him!” approach can only work if everybody ignores him. There isn’t even a remote possibility of that happening, so stop pushing it. Got any solutions that involve reality?
“Everyone should ignore him” is not my idea. I’m scatalogically against the “Ignore” list concept.
Just seems strange to complain about someone trying to hijack a thread and then help them hijack it.
So you’re saying you’re shit at it?
Well, it sure as shit ain’t “categorically”. Clearly too much ambiguity.
HDickhead happy for homeless having issues in cold Salt Lake City. You could even read this as cheering homeless folks dying due to harsh conditions.
Is there any other way to read that?
No, not really.
My read was actually charitable: that the homeless would move south/somewhere warmer. It didn’t occur to me until later (when another poster mentioned it) that the homeless dying off reading was probably also meant. I guess that’s what I get for always trying to think the best of people.