yeah, WTF? I love how the people in the herpes ads talk about not having time to take all the pills the competing herpes drug requires (something like 7/day). What are they doing that they’re too busy to treat herpes? Out contracting syphillis?
And the purple pill AETBOND417 mentioned wasn’t Prilosec, it was Vioxx, and it’s purpose isn’t stated in the commercial. Drug ads are getting as inscrutible as jeans ads.
First, Claritin is for allergies, not some horrible sexually transmitted disease.
Second, Hi Opal!
Third, no, we don’t have enough drugs. We can’t cure cancer, we can’t cure MD, we can’t cure Alzheimer’s, we can’t cure AIDS, we can’t cure the common cold, etc.
Not to mention the fact that because of mutations and people abusing antibiotics, we’re dealing with bacteria that are increasingly resistant to even new generation antibiotics.
I don’t know about you, but I happen to prefer to take an Excedrin rather than chew on a piece of willow bark.
But I’ve always like this little thought, which I did not write, but thankfully ain’t copyrighted:
There’s a stupid ad for some medical product, which says “In clinical trials, the most common side effect was headache”.
A curiously evasive and meaningless statement. The moment I heard it, I immediately realized that the lab results must have looked something like this:
Side effect Incidence
----------- ---------
Headache 99%
Massive brain haemorrhage 98%
Malignant cancer of the genitals 92%
Tertiary syphilis 85%
Windows NT 76%
Smallpox 40%
Death of one kidney 33%
Explosive cranial dispersal 20%
Total body ionization 11%
Really? I wasn’t paying attention to the commercial at the time. . . So, has anyone else seen that “Scalp Itch” stuff? I’ve only seen the commercial once, and the usual drug ads . . .