Nope, this is an absolute lie. And you know it. We have posted back and forth in many threads.
I have said time and again, I am in favor of moderate gun control laws. I really like the Gun laws that Biden pushed through Congress a while ago for example. I don’t like Gun bans as they violate the Bill of Rights- which I support- all of them. You only posted this lie as you thought I wouldn’t come here and call you out for the cowardly liar you are.
And while I am here-
Nope, I never posted any spoilers in any GoT threads. I did complain- often and loudly that the OP got special rules that we have never, ever given any other OP- that the books not be mentioned. Not spoilers from the books, no mention that the books even exist. I will admit that I complained too much about that special rule (which is why I was banned), but I never did any spoilers- in fact i hardly ever posted in those threads.
No, I just think that some of our standard spelling are stupid. Many decades ago there was a push for simplified spelling, and America did accept several- we spell it “color” not “colour”. “Thru” is a varient spelling. I am sorry if that annoys you, I will cut down on it, but you have to admit that “through” adds an unnecessary three letters. It is too bad all those spelling corrections did not take hold.
Of course you are. You hate the way i call you out on your anarcho -communism. “Property is theft” is complete communist bullshit.
I met Gygax once- at a Con. I don’t think I am special in doing that- thousands and thousands of us Old School D&D fans have done the same.
Read The Sleepwalkers- I myself thought Germany started if after reading the Guns of August. She was lied to- France doctored the documents- France and Russia mobilized and declared first- just by a day, sure. Mind you- the Kaiser giving AH “carte blanche” was one of the causes of WW1, so they are also to blame.
But you are right- I am not a Real Doctor, I have never claimed to be.
The problem with you, Dude- is that you HATE being proven wrong. I have done so- with cites. Yep, I make mistakes (like when I mixed up the two USS Yorktown carrier specs. ). And no one likes admitting they are wrong. I don’t either. But you- you are just a little cowardly shitweasel. When I prove you wrong with a cite, okay, I dont expect you to admit it. Most people would counter with another cite- but you hate cites and prefer your own biased opinions. So instead- when I prove you wrong with a cite you could not counter, you run here and while about it like the cowardly little shitweasel you are. Remember when you called the Imperial Japanese tanks “paper mache” ? And I pointed out that the Russian tanks at the time had the same crappy armor and guns? the Russian liked crappy worthless thin armored light tanks and they made tens of thousands of them, until they made the very decent T34- which was not used in the Russo-Japanese conflict- as they hadn’t been built yet-
In 1939, the most numerous Soviet tank models were the T-26 infantry tank and the BT series of fast tanks. The T-26 was slow-moving, designed to keep pace with infantry on the ground. The BT tanks were cavalry tanks: fast-moving and light, designed for manoeuver warfare… During the Battle of Lake Khasan in July 1938 and the Battles of Khalkhin Gol in 1939, an undeclared border war with Japan on the frontier with occupied Manchuria, the Soviets deployed numerous tanks against the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA). Although the IJA Type 95 Ha-Go light tanks had diesel engines,[17][page needed] the Red Army’s T-26 and BT tanks used petrol engines which, while common in tank designs of the time, often burst into flames when hit by IJA tank-killer teams[18] using Molotov cocktails. Poor-quality welds in the Soviet armour plates left small gaps between them, and flaming petrol from the Molotov cocktails easily seeped into the fighting and engine compartment; portions of the armour plating that had been assembled with rivets also proved to be vulnerable.[19] The Soviet tanks were also easily destroyed by the Japanese Type 95 tank’s 37 mm gunfire, despite the low velocity of that gun,[20] or “at any other slightest provocation”.[21] The use of riveted armor(or is that 'armour") led to a problem whereby the impact of enemy shells, even if they failed to disable the tank or kill the crew on their own, would cause the rivets to break off and become projectiles inside the tank.
You also used those tens of thousands of worthless deathtrap early Soviet tanks as “proof” that the Soviets were advanced in their technology. Mind you- the T34 was a damn good tank, but only one of the three best mass produced tanks of WW2- which I proved by a cite.
Which cites you ignored- well kinda, because you came here into the Pit and started your cowardly shitweasel lies. That is how you react to being proven wrong by cites. Okay, I don’t always admit when I am wrong, but I, at least sometimes do. I might be an asshole at times, I can’t deny that, but I am not a coward- like you are. Shitweasel.
Thank you. Or is that “Thank yu”? 
But I will try to be better on that anyway- but I can’t promise i won’t slip up.