Rule 34
I went ahead and asked him directly. He ignored me. We have our answer.
Occasionally other posters do that, but he seems to do it as much as everyone else put together.
Pretty much everyone googles to gather information and obviously mistakes happen but DD is in a class by himself for citing things that say the opposite to his argument.
He also is the only person I’ve seen that quotes the part that contradicts himself.
Yep, replied to the thread and ignored your question. It’s pretty clear that his opinion is not well informed.
Well, that’s… disappointing.
Normal people do not lump places such as the British West Indies with the United Kingdom (that Historical Myths thread again).
“But here with Chavez unable to defend himself, I also give some side eye. 50 years and they are only now coming forward? Memories that old are pretty worthless.”
Really? If I were raped by a famous man I was working with, twice, and after two long pregnancies I bore two children from that….my memories 50 years later would be “worthless”?
Not that I’m discounting the memories of other women whose abuse experiences had less obvious, tangible effects. I don’t think their memories after 50 years are “worthless,” either.
He also couldn’t be bothered at first to read the NYT article before jumping in with that judgment, so he doubted that the other two complainants had been identified. When the message finally got through, we got “this is sad” from him.
He was right about it being sad, just not exactly the way he meant it.