I pit DrDeth

But not before I became the first (and now probably only!) likes “double ace” in SDMB history.

On that note… thanks, @discobot!

Hi! To find out what I can do, say @discobot display help.

This post does a nice job of summarizing the misinterpretations and unwarranted conclusions of DD and his revisionist source, which at least he’s finally learned to call by its correct name.

Fuck dude, don’t feed the troll. He’s at best aggressively ignorant with a below room temperature IQ when it comes to anything relating to history. The most you can hope for is that he’ll stop talking about specific points for a short while only to bring them back up again, willfully ignoring that he’s been proven to be demonstrably wrong.

It’s absolutely mindboggling that he’s managed to avoid being banned for all of these years.

Amateur_Barbarian comes to mind.

Diogenes_the_Cynic, the perfect parent (among other characteristics) also comes to mind.

Ah, yes, who can forget The Dio Show.

Oh, and how Dio hated rap and hip hop. He never missed a chance to point that out in every thread it was mentioned.

Coming here to give this brain dead assertion the response it deserves:

No it wasn’t, you fucking moron.

It is not a violation of another state’s sovereignty, nor is it a clear signal of an imminent attack. What it was to Germany at the onset of WWI, however, was a sign that if they did not instigate their premeditated war of aggression ASAP, then they might lose the advantage in their premeditated war of aggression.

It might have forced Germany’s hand, from a certain point of view (using the same metaphor as before, from the point of view of a domestic abuser prone to yelling “Look what you made me do!” as they beat their partner for something trivial, like over-starching their shirts), but it was not an act of war.

This, totally this. Not every action that leads to war is itself an act of war. If you insult a leader’s tie and his ego is so fragile he invades in response, that insult isn’t labeled an act of war.

What an ignorant, apologist, victim-blaming pile of mock-worthy bullshit. DrD is too dumb to ever be given the slightest bit of credibility in any historical discussion.

If you’re a sports fan, he’s like the Skip Bayless of history.

(For those unfamiliar, Skip Bayless is practically a professional troll who has made a career on “hot takes” and generally you can assume that whatever he says is going to be the opposite of reality.)

From the FQ thread Did British soldiers in WWII drink tea or coffee?

He just can’t not drop hijack turds in the thread punchbowl tea pot.

Let us be clear that the behavior exhibited by the poster in question is not remotely limited to “older gents.” I prefer it when we treat everyone, even posters we don’t like, as individuals, and not attribute their characteristics to their membership in a group.

Which is, ironically, why mobilization by Germany meant war. Not that mobilization was inherently an act of war, but for Germany - and Germany only - it may as well have been. Because for Germany - and Germany only - once mobilization was declared, soldiers were going to be deposited on the Belgian border in their hundreds of thousands daily and immediately start marching through Belgium. This was an inherent part of German war plans; there was no option in the train timetables to do anything but deposit the troops to immediately violate Belgian neutrality and kick off the war. The fault is the German war plan, not mobilization in and of itself, as you said. And as has been pointed out to him repeatedly over the years.

Yes, and also some assholes aren’t so stupid and some idiots are nice and humble.

And he can’t stop being full of shit either. That scene is from the movie. The book goes to pains to note that the road from Nijmegen to Arnhem was the worst possible terrain for tanks, it was a single lane elevated road surrounded by polder - land that was below sea level and impassible by tanks. The British tanks would have to move in single file on an elevated road and be sitting ducks, trivially easy to bring to a bloody halt by as much as a single German anti-tank gun without their infantry support which was still in heavy fighting clearing out Nijmegen.

Which is exactly what happened. From the book:

As Vandeleurs appeared, Langton, unsuccessful in his attempts to knock out
the gun, climbed out to meet them. “It was a mess up there,” Joe Vandeleur
remembers. “We tried everything. There was no way to move the tanks off the
road and down the steep sides of that damn dike. The only artillery support I
could get was from one field battery, and it was too slow registering on its
targets.” His lone infantry company was pinned down and he was unable to call
in the Typhoons. “Surely we can get support somewhere,” Langton said.
Vandeleur slowly shook his head, “I’m afraid not.” Langton persisted. “We could
get there,” he pleaded. “We can go if we get support.” Vandeleur shook his head
again. “I’m sorry,” he said. “You stay where you are until you get further
orders.” To Vandeleur it was clear that the attack could not be resumed until the
infantry of Major General G. I.
Thomas’ 43rd Wessex Division could reach the Irish Guards. Until then,
Vandeleur’s tanks were stranded alone on the high exposed road. A single self
propelled gun trained on the elevated highway had effectively stopped the entire
relief column almost exactly six miles from Arnhem

And I don’t care much about your preferences.

If that warrants a pitting of my own, I’ll accept that and perhaps the comment would have been better placed there

So do some other departed, like Starving Artist.

Nah. The comment was fine here and was very kindly stated. Of course you may be one of those folk with some stick up their ass! Whatever age or gender!

FWIW I know just as many younger folk of both genders “who think their unsolicited, poorly remembered, and usually wrong input provides not only value but conclusive and definitive weight to the topic at hand” as older gents.

Feel free to not care.

Someone started a thread which concerns both history and the military? That’s a twofer for this thread’s guest of dishonor. There’s no way he’s not going to sully it.

DD has morphed into entirely blaming the Allies for WWI.

See what they made Germany do?!!

What a jackass.