Yes it seems that if there is one solid and not deniable criticism of her, it is indeed the blindness and the false sense of a destiny although if she had been able to listen to criticism she should have known that she was not the vehicle and that her skills and her role was to play an emminence grise in the future to support some charismatic candidate.
It is then in this data and the details showing in this article the clear failure of her as the candidate, it is indeed her failure, it is not the huge outpouring and increase for the Trump, but the discouragement and the failure of the inspiration role.
(and even here the data there says that even on the republican side there was great discouragement, it suggests that a figure other than Mrs Clinton could have attracted in an anti trump vote).
I think these numbers say clearly, it is the personal failure despite being the well financed and the better organized. It is the failure of the mechanistic technocratic view that forgets the human character motivation and the role of the human charisma…
or so I see if from overseas looking at these American voting numbers. I am angry to see this, as it seems to me this person’s blindness and lack of charisma has made the world more dangerous by being the person who opened needlessly the door to this Trump.