If you are talking about the traffic circle hysteria one, I saw that. I didn’t want to go highjack that, because it wasn’t actually about anything important. I do not get my jollies by scolding people for their language in general – but in the context of this thread, you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Keep it up, though, it’s going really well for you!
Is it hysterical to be afraid of creeping antisemitism on the left?
ETA: Is it hysterical to be afraid of creeping misogyny in the center?
Do you really want to reopen the Israel and Palestine debate in this thread?
It’s your thread, it’s really up to you. We were actually having a pretty interesting discussion before you showed up.
The decision to move all the Israel/Palestine posts to another thread had nothing to do with me.
A pretty interesting, completely off-topic hijack that deserved and got its own thread, you mean.
No, not that one. Never mind.
Trump has also eluded to a desire to use nuclear weapons numerous times, even though he is very careful to phrase it as ambiguously as possible. But that’s in the “hysterical” column, as far as you are concerned.
“Several months ago, a foreign policy expert on the international level went to advise Donald Trump. And three times [Trump] asked about the use of nuclear weapons. Three times he asked at one point if we had them why can’t we use them,” Scarborough said on his “Morning Joe” program."
He even expressed interest in using them against hurricanes.
Now, he says he won’t use them against Iran. I know I feel much safer, because he always keeps his word. Of course, it is also possible that I’m just being hysterical due to the madman that occupies the Oval Office.
Could you guys at least get together and form a consensus on what it is I’m completely wrong about?
Because some of you are saying I’m completely wrong because nobody has ever said Trump is planning on committing genocide or restoring slavery or starting a nuclear war. And some of you are saying I’m completely wrong because of course Trump is planning on committing genocide or restoring slavery or starting a nuclear war.
I think there’s a blush icon somewhere —
sometimes I flail so much that I wind up not posting.
Sure, you are wrong to insult your political allies and dismiss their concerns by referring to them as “hysterical”.
To the extent you have a valid point about how best to defeat Trump, you would be far better served by finding common ground with your allies and encouraging them to lobby in more effective ways.
It’s not about this claim or that fear. It’s about your going out of your way to insult your allies.
Just to be clear, are you saying I’m wrong because those concerns are realistic or are you saying I’m wrong because while the claims are not realistic I shouldn’t have used the word hysterical?
As for finding common ground, I’d have a difficult time doing that. As I noted, people are putting forth mutually conflicting positions. I can’t agree with what one group is saying without disagreeing with what another group is saying by doing so.
I also strongly disagree with the final thing you wrote. I have been repeatedly insulted in this thread. But I have gone out of my way to remain polite and not insult anybody. The fact that some people feel that they have been insulted doesn’t mean I insulted them.
The sea lion has been polite in The Pit, huzzah!
Who specifically said that? If you are referring to me, I never said Trump was planning on starting a nuclear war. But to think it isn’t a possibility is absurd. He’s that stupid, and that dangerous. And being fearful of that possibility, despite it being remote, is not being hysterical.
But after 2,000 posts, I don’t think you are ever going to get what people are trying to tell you.
Stop being testerical . . . it’s sealion.
With or without that list comprising one name, Der Trihs?
I don’t consider one poster a relevant sample size.
In my humble opinion, some of the claims you’ve dismissed are more realistic than others. But no, it’s not about whether you think they are realistic. It’s about insulting and demeaning your potential political allies. And dismissing someone’s fears as hysterical is absolutely insulting and demeaning. As any number of posters have pointed out.
So if I’m understanding you, you’re saying that Trump wants to use nuclear weapons but he’s not planning on using nuclear weapons.
That’s a pretty subtle distinction.
There’s a corollary to this line of thinking. That you personally don’t feel that you have insulted people also doesn’t necessarily mean that you have not offended them.
Offense is always in the eye of the recipient, and may be (and frequently is) given without ill intent of the originator. Decent people with a modicum of grace and tact would offer apologies for such unintentional offense when an instance of this is pointed out to them. You have not done so, and have compounded the original offense with a sustained display of intransigence that makes your denial of ill intent an increasingly dubious proposition.