The SDMB staff has reviewed this thread, which was flagged by many posters, and discussed it at length. We agree with Miller that the view expressed by split_p_j , namely that anyone who becomes drunk thereby consents to rape, is indefensible and repugnant. We’re also obliged to say that (a) it isn’t against our rules as currently stated, but (b) it should be. It’ll take us a while to formulate a new rule in precise language, but the gist will be this: if you express yourself in a way that we consider to be beyond the pale of civil discussion, whether in style or substance, we’ll warn you to knock it off, specifying what it is we want you to stop, on penalty of losing your posting privileges. This rule applies in all forums including the Pit.
This rule goes into effect now. Accordingly, split_p_j, you’re hereby warned to make no further posts on this board suggesting that a person who becomes inebriated thereby consents to, or is deserving of, assault or other crime. This is a ludicrous and offensive notion. Any further comments along these lines will result in revocation of your posting privileges, as will any attempt to argue with us or otherwise prolong this absurd controversy.
This warning is directed at split_p_j , but anyone else making a similar argument will get a similar warning and face similar consequences.
We’re not attempting to suppress discussion of sensitive topics, such as what constitutes consent to sex, nor are we trying to enforce particular opinions. We can’t anticipate everything we’d consider to be too crazy even for the Pit and don’t expect to maintain a list of proscribed views. We’ll provide the offending party with a warning before taking any further action.
A more formal statement of this rule will be provided in due time. Thanks for your cooperation.