I Pit Split_p_j

Even easier to not post the lyrics and provide unsupported context to try to prove a point.

Ok so that is my fault. I just assumed that it was known that Public Enemy was a political hip-hop group that basically help start the political hip-hop protest music movement.

So, instead of providing the lyrics in question you’re going with a replay of ‘Y’all are too old and too white to understand’?

Let me help you again,


Hang on – roll all this back. Recall why you mentioned Public Enemy in the first place. In any of this … is your point about the AKA sorority (they were systematically rejecting dark-skinned pledges circa 1986 at Howard) backed up?

You’re not tying stuff together. It’s “Over here! AKA was bigoted against darked-skin women while Kamala was pledging! To the point they couldn’t join!” and then “Over there! Public Enemy rapped about AKA’s bigotted practices!” and then “Over here again! Public Enemy was rapping with a social conscience way back when!

I mean, the car’s careening all over the place. Jumping curbs. Hitting mailboxes, lampposts, pedestrians. There’s no hands on the wheel.

I’m not going to be able to provide that, because they would have never said it directly. It’s art and my take could be wrong.

I’m saying that the fact that Harris is an AKA may not be a positive in the way it’s being portrayed in the media.

And that the demographic Trump is aiming for could be swayed to that message. The Trump
team’s line of attack is based on real data and could be a problem for Harris. I’m really saying that Trump is being well advised.

I know you think you ‘won’ now, but it remains to be seen.

I’m beginning to see why the guest of honor moved to the Pit, because in most other forums, especially P&E, he’d be falling very quickly into the Bad Faith Argument and Tactics and the sort of hostility (for perfectly accurate questioning) that got Sliced_Alone in trouble.

Which I’m positive is what SPJ is referring to when it comes to “unpopular viewpoints” being banned. No, bad faith actions and arguments, as well as hostile behavior when questioned gets less tolerance. Oh noes.

This is my shocked face.

:astonished:

Well, not that shocked.

:slight_smile:

Ok, with your links I hope to be able to show that it’s not me saying this, or that is just my feelings.

Right now, I will admit, I cannot directly link to Sirius shows that back me on this live on air.

I gave timestamps so anyone with Sirius can look at the Progress Channel to the hosts and timestamps I said.

You all win for now.

That is fine, and you can put up all the happy faces you want. I can’t link to some things right now, so it’s dismissed here. It only really shows how out of touch this format is.

I think right now I put the information out and gave timestamps. Anyone with a cell phone and Sirius/XM radio can go and hear it for themselves.

I will try to find a way to link the audio directly to here, but in the meantime yes pile on if it makes you feel better.

Just remember that the Trump camp is going after a demographic that could cost Harris the election.

Are you going to get that no matter how many people (that are not a part of the Trump campaign) agree with your hypothesis it is not evidence that your hypothesis is correct?

You are very kind. He’s spewing complete bullshit that he’s making up as he goes along. As usual.

Translation: “I am just making up shit as I go, and you people are all mean for doubting my make-believe stories.”

No, I don’t get that. I see a clear strategy here; the only question is if it will work.

This board was dumbfounded as to what Trump was trying to do. I explained what was happening and why.

I make no claim as to if it will work or not.

He is smart in laying into the fact that this place drove off all of the other black posters over the last decade or so.

That is not what I’m saying.

If I’m just making things up how do you explain the Trump team’s actions? They basically align to everything I’ve been trying to warn this board about for over a year now.

I have an hypothesis,
John Wilkes Booth shot John F. Kennedy in Ford’s theatre in Dallas, Vermont.
I provide you with comments from 5,368 people stating that they agree that John Wilkes Booth shot John F. Kennedy in Ford’s theatre in Dallas, Vermont.
Have I in any way proved my hypothesis?

You do realize you’re just throwing red meat to a 9/11 truther?

Oh yes, my people have learned much from cats!

I don’t really know what you are trying to say here. The Trump team is basically doing everything I said over a year ago.

I don’t have a hypothesis; I’m trying to explain to this board what is happening in real time or even before things happen.

In the thread I’m banned from they are still scratching their heads saying what Is Trump trying to do here, I just looked at it. Like children.

Meanwhile everyone else gets it, it’s really only a question if it will work and that is of course unknown.

Then let’s try another one!!!

If everyone on this board thinks you are a troll does that mean you are, in fact, a troll?

If you want to end this thread and stuff, you got to post loud. Could put a lot—I’ve been posting in this thread now for one hundred and twenty five posts. I could post in it for another one hundred and twenty five posts. I’m not proud. Or tired. So we’ll wait till it comes around again, and this time with four-part harmony and feeling. We’re just waiting for it to come around is what we’re doing.‎ All right now.‎