That’s right. All of you MFers!
Why?
For engaging and debating Rand Rover as if anything rational can come from his other side. It is a complete waste of time. I suggest when Rand Rover posts something infuriatingly tone deaf, wrong and mronic (or simply whenver RR posts), ignore it, act like it is never there. Or better yet, treat it as some form of perfromance art, read it with a bongo drum, beatnik style, snap your finger for approval and move on.
Linky?
I don’t. Perhaps you should get the same treatment RR gets from me, for bringing him up to me.
Sure, Link
Meh. I consider him much like I consider Shodan and Starving Artist. Pretty fun to post with as long as the topic is not politics.
Another pitting of Randy? Thought my watch was broken or somethin’…
I accept this pitting.
In my defense, I have been trying to cut down lately.
This is not a Rand rant, it is seriously meant for those who engage him.
Yeah, they suck.
Bah. This OP is another variant on DNFTT, except the troll in this case is simply someone who holds exasperating views. DNFTT doesn’t work, has never worked, and will never work on a message board.
That sounds like a challenge!
What I wonder is why anyone gets so up in arms over Rand anymore. That’s just his schtick. Sometimes it’s damned funny.
ETA: didn’t read Giraffe’s post.
Meh…people still participate in adhay threads (gods know why), and gonzomax’s inane and ridiculous posts are still seriously answered, instead of getting the level of derision they deserve.
-XT
You don’t see a flaw in the plan of starting a thread to be sure than Rand Rover never gets any attention?
Not sure I agree 100% wth your detective work, there, Lou.
Regards,
Shodan
But…but…but…
I LOVE watching you all flail about, trying to refute his arguments. It’s fantasticly amusing because you fail every time.
Well, to be fair, it is hard to argue with conceited ideological fantasy. Like a nerd who argues that the Lord of the Rings movies are terrible because they left out one or more characters and that they could have made better movies.
Don’t you have some faxes to send?
Sorry, it just never gets old.
Ya, I love how he “proved” that UHC in Canada would eventually destroy the Canadian economy, based on the fact that unemployment rates used to be high in the past. He didn’t want to acknowledge the current positive economic performance in UHC-burdened Canada, because that did not agree with his premise.
He’s either stupid as a box of rocks, or deliberately obtuse and antagonistic.
Gangster Octopus’ reasonable assertion is that he is the latter, and we should stop engaging it. I admit to being guilty as charged.
Pfsh. You and your facts.
Whatever. I still like the guy.
Me too. I don’t get the rage; he’s not the only person who’s wrong on the internet out here.