There is a good case to be made that Bush did not devote resources to finding Osama because he wanted to focus on the Iraq war (which as we know as an undeniable FACT now was started based on a lie, the false claim that Iraq had WMD when US intelligence was saying they had already destroyed the WMD.)
EDIT: " disgusting globalists" Ok blinky how about you tell us exactly why globalists are “disgusting”? I’d be surprised if you can explain your actual reasoning instead of regurgitating Breitbart talking points.
Every pope is a silly individual to me, but the OP is only hating THIS pope because he spoke some words that don’t support the dumbest man IN THE WORLD, B&P’s only hero. :rolleyes:
I’m sure B&P has similar opinions of Cynthia Merkel, Mitt Romney and anyone else who doesn’t support his favorite example of orange “greatness.”
I got a PM from Zuck. He’s torn up. Says he’d give it all up for a pat on the head from Dinkyandstinky.
Maybe you should try it, these are people who have still have some concept of ‘reason’ (though I’m not so sure about Zuckerberg, I think he’s just some kind of android).
he blows his nose at you; your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries
Again, you’ve clearly never been to the Vatican.
Re-writing documented history???
March 2002
President Bush Holds Press Conference
Press Conference by the President
The James S. Brady Briefing Room
4:00 P.M. EST
“… So I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him,…”
"…And, again, I don’t know where he is. I – I’ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him… "
Well, they stopped the Vandals and the Visigoths then 
The vandals. Were they the ones that left burning bags of dog poop on your steps?
Why do righties constantly mis-state the opposing point of view and then proceed to refute their own mis-statement? Well, easier than thinking, I suppose.
Did they let in Martha & the Vandellas?
I’d like to think nobody is really as stupid as the OP seems to be. But then I recall that millions of people actually voted for Trump last November.
Maybe if the Bush administration hadn’t wasted so many intelligence resources looking for a reason to invade Iraq, he could have found Osama.
Even if Vatican City were surrounded by walls, it wouldn’t be for the same purpose as the Great Wall of Donald. Italians aren’t sneaking in to steal Catholic jobs, like priesthoods. Italians aren’t smuggling in illegal drugs, unless it’s sacramental wine that’s past its expiration date. Italians aren’t getting free education and living supported by Vatican taxpayers.
It’s all playground comebacks like “Am not, you are!” and “So’s your face!”
He’s clearly never been out of his mother’s basement.
Not even for school. It’s a bit of a Bertha Mason thing.
Neither, akshully. Both groups sacked Rome. Also the Gauls, the Ostrogoths, the Normans, a bunch of disgruntled German mercenaries, the French and (possibly) my grandfather.
I guess what I’m saying is that *maybe *the Romans are a bit shit at sieges :).
Rome has been sacked more often than Tony Romo?
Why should anyone care what Blinkyandpinky thinks about the Pope, anyway? I don’t give a rat’s ass about either of these mooks, truth be told.
Interesting. Perhaps excess bourbon is also partly to blame for the sacking of Washington in the early 21st century.
While Leo IV did indeed built the Leonine Walls around the Vatican in response to the Saracen raid of 846 and bits of those walls still survive, those aren’t the ones that now surround the Vatican - the current walls are much later, mostly dating from the reign of Pius IV in the sixteenth century. Their construction had rather more to do with the fact that there had been serious rioting in Rome following the death of the previous Pope, Paul IV, and that the Sack of Rome had happened only a few decades earlier.
