I thought it was wonderful and will pay to see it again (last night’s viewing was a free advanced screening). I’d heard it was long but it didn’t feel that way to me, it all pretty much zipped by. It’s unabashedly romantic, a sweeping epic that swept me off my feet. Not Titanic level great (and if that phrase makes you cringe because you hate Titanic, do yourself a favor and stay away) but pretty damned good. I went in knowing I would probably like it because I love Baz Luhrman, Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman anyway, and maybe I didn’t love it quite as much as I had hoped, it was fully as good as I expected it to be.
Set a couple of years before World War II, it tells the story of an English woman (Kidman) who comes to Australia to oversee her late husband’s beef farm, how she comes to appreciate the people and the land, and becomes a part of history completely by accident.
Nicole Kidman’s character is insufferable at first, but gets much better and I ended up liking her a lot. She’s gorgeous too. Hugh Jackman is, well, swoony as always as Drover, a man who lives on and by the land and helps Kidman. The Aborigine child, Brandon Walters as Nullah, is wonderful, especially considering this is his first movie and he’s the heart and soul of the film. David Gulpilil as “King George” the majestic Aborigine falsely accused of murder is always worth watching. David Wenham (Faramir in LOTR) is a good actor but was a bit miscast. It’s hard to see him as a bad guy, especially since his character is shallow and unredeeming (is that a word?), very hard to take seriously. Maybe some of his scenes explaining why he was the way he was ended up on the cutting room floor. There are several smaller roles that were all done well and some of them I would like to have known far more about (Nullah’s mom, Cath Carney, or the drunk lawyer to name three)
The movie is excruciatingly beautiful to look at, rendering the Australian outback as at first dry, dusty and boring, then gradually more and more magical and awe-inspiring. Some people will have problems with the special effects used to depict the bombing of Darwin, but I didn’t have a problem with it. Some of the movie is stylized and it fit right in for me.
I also loved the deep respect it gives the Aboriginal people and how it touches on some of the prejudice and appalling policies they faced, such as taking half-caste kids away from their mothers to be raised in white households, with an eye to “breeding the black out” of them when they got older. I would imagine that anyone who’s seen the movie Rabbit-Proof Fence (not to mention Walkabout) would have a leg up on understanding some of what goes on and is talked about in the film.
It’s not going to be for everybody and I can already hear some of the bitching and moaning sure to come (“it’s too loooong/I can’t understand the accents/it’s confusing, I don’t know what’s going on/the Japanese never bombed Australia, give me a break*/that Nicole Kidman character is a real bitch/whine whine whine whine whine”) but for those who go in knowing that it’s a long movie and you just have to go with it, let it happen to you and not look too hard for nitpicks, you’ll probably enjoy it.
*sneer at this one, which is something I actually heard, because yes, in fact, the Japanese did attack Australia.
I don’t know how it will do with American audiences, but even if it “bombs” in the US, it’s still going to be a massive hit in Australia and probably elsewhere too. It’s an Australian movie made for Australians, using a very important (and little-known) part of Australia’s history and folklore as a backdrop. If it doesn’t work for Americans, that’s America’s problem, not the movie’s problem.