I’m interested in what the dopers think of this incident. Opinions of those with legal or law enforcement background are especially welcome. I’ll tell you up front that everything came out ok and so I’m not looking for free legal advice.
Also, for those of you read this and are concerned that I was driving drunk, I can’t stop you from your opinion. I can only say that I have in the past stopped myself from driving after having too many. On this particular night I truly did not feel my driving would be impaired. In retrospect, I still feel this way.
It was last Thursday. I’m coming home from a school event at a bar when I was stopped two blocks from my apartment. I motioned the the cop that I was pulling into a shopping mall parking lot and he followed me.
The driver and his partner got out of the car. The partner held back behind my car where he remained, watching, during 90% of this. The officer asked to see my license and insurance, which I showed him. He told me I was going 55 in a 40. I honestly don’t believe I was going that fast, but I didn’t argue. I wasn’t paying strict attention to the spedometer but I’d say I was going a bit less than 50.
He never showed me a radar. I didn’t ask. My opinion is that he didn’t precisely know himself anyway.
He told me he smelled alcohol on my breath. I had had 4-5 beers over approximately a 3 hour period. He asked how many drinks I had had. I told him I had 2. Yes, that was a lie. I’m sorry for it. But I’ll somewhat justify it later on. Anyway, he asked me to step out of the car and that’s when the fun began.
Drunk tests! Yay!
This is the first time I had done anything like them. He gave me an eye test where he asked me to follow a pen.
I was asked to recite the alphabet without singing it. I did so slowly, twice, enunciating as much as possible.
I was asked to keep my foot in the air and count slowly until he told me to stop. I got up to 26 without falling before he finally finished that test.
At this point it was around 20 minutes later. I asked him, very respectfully, when he would be done with these tests and could determine for himself whether I was drunk or sober. He said just a few more tests.
I was asked to walk a straight line, pivot, come back. I did so without getting off balance.
The officer said I had a BAC of 1.2 to 1.3. Legal limit is .08. He said that I failed every test. Yup, every single test. “I thought you were drunk from the eye test, but I just wanted to make sure.” At this point he asked me again just how many drinks I had. Suddenly his partner was right up next to him. “Oh great, intimidation.” I thought. I repeated my original answer of two and his partner went back again. He wanted to catch me in a lie.
The end of the story is that he let me off with a warning. No ticket for speeding, no ticket for DUI. I just have to walk home and I’m scot free. Two blocks, no problemo. I thank him and that’s the end of that.
The officer in charge was a complete professional. He explained everything, very courteous during the whole thing, etc. But, I think he was lying. A lot. Through almost all of it.
First off, I sincerely doubt I had a BAC of 1.2. Doing some calculations, I figure the most I could have had is around .08, which is just at the legal limit and it is probably more like .06 or .05. I think he wanted me to think I was at 1.2 to scare me into confessing something which would give him a reason to arrest me.
I also don’t think I failed all the tests. I don’t think I failed ANY of the tests. My belief is that most drunks can’t walk a straight line or balance themselves on one leg for 26 seconds. The cop said, when I asked him, that he was checking for other things while I was doing this. I think that’s also a lie. I think he was just looking to see if I fell and I didn’t.
I think he let me off “with a warning” because there’s no way he could admit he’d just spent 20-30 minutes on a test that I’d passed.
I believe, but certainly cannot ever be sure, that he never even smelled alcohol on my breath. I think he used that as an excuse to get probable cause, get me out of the car, and thus conduct the tests.
Lots of “I thinks.” I don’t KNOW anything for certain. I’m hypothesizing, which is why I want to know from you guys.
I’m not upset about the tests. Hey, he’s just doing his job. I’m not upset about the lying either. I’m not even upset about having to walk home after “passing” the test. I would, however, be upset if he faked his probable cause to get me out of the car.
I am concerned. If I truly had a BAC of 1.2, would he have let me go with a warning? Why would he do that? How do normal stops of this kind play out?
Thanks for reading this long monstrosity and I look forward to your responses.