Idiot college students arrested for setting church fires in Alabama

Dang, that’s funny, but I’m embarassed for laughing.

This won’t stop right wing demagouges from exploiting the issue into the “War on Christianity” seminars though.

http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/03/exploiting_the_alabama_fires.php#more

How long before these dickwiches end up as part of Brickers unorganized but commonly directed anti-Christian conspiracy?

Guess what. All the burned churches were Baptist, and the boys’ college is Methodist-affiliated.

You think?

[1]: They repeatedly burn down churches, and they "don’t deserve to be where thye are. Correct: they deserve to be in a worse place.

[2]: “Good” people don’t run around burning churches. unless of course “good people” has somehow come to mean future felony arsonists.

[3]: They didn’t mean to do it?! The mechanics of burning a fucking building down aren’t attributable to an accident. Assembling fuel, placing it, lighting it: all deliberate acts.

[4]: Ah, the “Boys will be Boys, Especially When They’re Drunk” defense. Since when has being drunk and maliciously careless become a basis for extunation in a criminal proceeding?

Might I add that the critical thinking skills of these 16-year-olds frightens me?

Comon, lighten up. It was obviously a joke.

Just like the bombings of Dresden and Tokyo. Those bomber crews didn’t mean anything by it, they were just playing.

And it was fucking hilarious, just like this was. :rolleyes:

If it had been a single chuch, it might conceivably be an accident.

There’s no way 10 torched buildings could be construed as an accident, unless you’re a member of the fantastic 4.

cerberus, I think you’re getting your stories mixed. The quotes are from a separate story nanoda posted about 4 teens in Edmonton who ganged up on a stranger and beat him to death.

Just replace “burning down churches” with “murdering a random person you’d never met before.” Makes the excuses even scarier, don’t it?

Apparently, it was a “nice kid’s crime” that one of them had already committed. After all, he was on probation and “he’s a good kid.”

Mandatory sentence: 45 years w/ parole.

45 years before parole.

Mea Culpa on that.

The arguments work even better when someone is “accidentally killed.”

I can see not wanting to see the evil in people, but at some point, there it is, to be recognised or ignored.