The District of Columbia is shamefully undemocratically governed, having no representation in the U.S. Congress. It really should be a state, but what would it be called?
“District of Columbia” seems unwieldly. Would it then be the “State of the District of Columbia”? That’s stupid. If it is styled as “The District of Columbia” despite being a state - which is fine, as four states are styled “Commonwealth of…” then its short name would be Columbia. “Columbia” is overused, though, and the city is, technically, Washington.
But if it was called the State of Washington… uhh, that’s taken.
“Columbia” may be overused, but changing the name to something else entirely would be even more confusing. There’s no reason to keep the “District” part - other states having Commonwealth in their names is just a bit of historical detritus. No need to repeat that. So I vote plain old “Columbia.”
But why should it be a state? I just look a look at Population by State/Territory and DC has fewer people than every state but Vermont and Wyoming and 20% of Puerto Rico. Why don’t they just retroceed the rest of DC to Maryland just keep the Capitol/White House as DC?
Because DC hasn’t been part of Maryland for two hundred years. People always propose these weird hoops to keep Washingtonians from having representation and I always wonder why.
Yeah, but why? By the same logic, West Virginia should rejoin Virginia as it was part of the state more recently. I know you’re not making the case, but it’s always been an odd suggestion.
Ken Starr, yeah that guy, is surprisingly supportive of DC voting rights:
But this thread is about to call the State, I think some version of Washington DC is fine, but there’s obviously a lot of work to get there.
Maryland would make more sense, but neither Maryland or Virginia want DC, and most residents, myself included, would prefer our own statehood. More people live here than in Wyoming.
ETA: I don’t really care what it would be called. Since acronyms with meanings removed are the rage now–think BP or KFC–I’d like DC. But anything’s fine.
I would just go with DC. Why complicate things? It’s already there on a bunch of forms and a recognized postal state abbreviation and well known as that.
Since the SW part was returned to Virginia in 1846, I don’t see why most of the rest can’t be returned to MD.
Key areas around the Mall and whatnot could be kept as the DC. No real houses except for the White one. So no voters. The Feds run those areas as they do now.
MD gets a few more House seats …
And that’s where it falls apart. These would likely be Democratic seats and getting 2/3 of everybody to agree to do that isn’t going to happen.
If we were being semi-rational (and so this post goes down in flames) the logical thing to do is to take everything inside the beltway (got to stop somewhere) and make it a new state. Large geographic parts of Virginia would be happy to lose all those northern liberals. Maryland would be consoled with 2 more democratic senators, governance of the Metro would become somewhat easier. It all could make some sense.